Images from PhD expositions and research presentations.

On Artistic Research

Artistic Research in Norway takes the artist’s practice as its point of departure, and, as such, is in line with what one could call research in the arts. A high artistic standard is a key requirement. The artistic practice is at the core of the PhD result, but should be accompanied by an explicit reflection, which offers others access into the working methods and insights that emerge from the artistic research. The research methods employed can be individual or specific to each artistic field, such as composition, design, or dance.

The field of art is experimental in nature, and critically testing, challenging and overturning methods are integral parts of its culture. The reflection that is part of artistic practice, on context, content, process and methods, has a central place in artistic research.


In the Norwegian Act relating to Universities and University Colleges, artistic research has enjoyed equal status as other forms of research since 1995. The Norwegian Artistic Research Fellowship programme was established in 2003. Between 2003 and 2024 a total of 92 research fellows have graduated successfully from the program, from a diversity of fields: Music, fine art, performance, theatre, design, film, and architecture. 

 

In the work on developing the Norwegian Artistic Research Fellowship Programme in 1999–2000, the following statements from Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design in London had considerable influence:


  • "Art and design practices are intellectual pursuits in their own right not requiring translation to other terms in order to have sense and coherence.
  • Art and design works embody ‘meaning’ through their interior symbolic languages and syntax (formal organisation).
  • Art and design works embody ‘meaning’ through their discursive relationship to other works in their field and their corresponding cultural positions.
  • Art and design works can be read by those trained in the subject in the same way that, for example, mathematicians read mathematics or philosophers read philosophy."


(Excerpt from "Research and Development in the Arts 1995–2015: Twenty years of artistic research", 2014).

→ Dive deeper: The report from the working group appointed by the National Council for Artistic Research, Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions "Research and Development in the Arts 1995–2015: Twenty years of artistic research", can be read here.

Reasearch on, for, and in the arts

In 2006, Henk Borgdorff, Professor emeritus of Theory of Research in the Arts at the Academy of Creative and Performing Arts, Leiden University, described three different categories linked to research and art:


  • research on the arts (…investigations aimed at drawing valid conclusions about art practice from theoretical distance…) 
  • research for the arts (…applied research in a narrow sense…) 
  • research in the arts (…the artistic practice itself is an essential component of both the research process and the research results…)

Elaborating on the latter category, he argues that:


“We can justifiably speak of artistic research (‘research in the arts’) when that artistic practice is not only the result of the research, but also its methodological vehicle, when the research unfolds in and through the acts of creating and performing. This is a distinguishing feature of this research type within the whole of academic research.” Borgdorff (2010)

Final exposition by PhD candidate Soren Thilo Funder, 2023.

Artistic research in the future academy

Danny Butt states in the book Artistic Research in the Future Academy that the rapid growth of doctoral-level art education challenges traditional ways of thinking about academic knowledge: 


"The last three decades have seen an explosion in debate around the issue of research practices in the creative arts, reflecting a larger and longer – if more sporadic – debate about the institutional position of the art school within the university, and the role of the art academy." Butt (2017)


He also argues that there are four main positions when it comes to the question of knowledge production in Artistic Research and its role in the university:

"
Firstly, there is the sceptical view that holds that art is art and research is research, and neither domain benefits from their confusion. (...). This same model of knowledge also underpins the next two hybrid views of knowledge in artistic research, which have been the most influential in the early stages of doctoral programme establishment. In these views, the research through practice must have its transferability secured through accompanying writing. (...). The fourth approach, implied by the various administrative reforms of research funding in the United Kingdom and its colonies, is that creative works in themselves constitute a form of research which can contribute to knowledge." Butt (2017)


→ Dive deeper: Artistic Research in the Future Academy was launched at Goldsmiths College, University of London on August 16 and in Melbourne at ACCA on October 24 2017. You can watch the talk “How Artistic Research Ends”recorded October 24, 2017. 

A brief history of the Norwegian program

In 2014 the National Council for Artistic Research, Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions appointed a working group that produced a report about research and development in the Arts in Norway between 1995–2015. The working group's mandate was to describe the relationship between artistic research and reflection; between artistic research and artistic practice, and the competence requirements of employees based on artistic qualifications. The group should also propose important specifications of which qualities artistic research brings to the field (‘what does artistic research do?’ – in contrast to ‘what is artistic research?’) and examine possible alternatives to the term ‘artistic research’ and assess the consequences of any changes. The main inspiration for the Norwegian Artistic Research Fellowship programme came from the UK and especially the Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design in London had considerable influence, because they so clearly describe art as a subject area that communicate in a peer context.

 

2003-2018: One national fellowship programme

Until 2018 there was only one research fellowship programme in Norway; the Norwegian Artistic Research Fellowship Programme, and fellows from all disciplines and institutions did relate to the same set of guidelines. These guidelines stated that the final project had to include bort an artistic work and a reflection, but that the fellows had the freedom to choose the format - there was no requirement for a written part.

 

The Norwegian model of artistic research has been quite inter-disciplinary, with a joint professional training component for the fellows since 2003 (from 2018 replaced with the Norwegian Artistic Research School). The Artistic Research Forums (ARF) was also early established as a national meeting place. In 2011 the Project programme was established to support artistic research projects led by Professors or Associate Professors, and several of the projects supported by the program have involved research groups from a diversity of institutions and subject fields. 

Nina Malterud talks about the development of the Norwegian Model of artistic research. The video is from SKUBA, which is a video resource bank by CEMPE - Centre for Excellence in Music Performance Eduacation, hosted at the Norwegian academy of music (2014-2023). 

2018: The first Norwegian Artistic PhD program is established

The national research fellowship programme is by now replaced by the institutional PhD programmes. The Norwegian Academy of Music (NMH) in Oslo was the first to establish a PhD program in Artistic Research in 2018, soon followed by the University of Bergen (UiB), the Oslo National Academy of the Arts (KHiO), and NTNU in Trondheim. From 2018 fellows from the different institutions are part of separate PhD programs, and must also relate to slightly different regulations. The national research fellowship programme will end in 2024. 

 

A variation of PhD regulations

While the regulations from NMH and UIB are quite similar, and also to a large degree relate to the former guidelines for the national fellowship program, there are a few quite important differences between these regulations and the regulations for KHiO and NTNU. For example, at KHiO the relationship between the artistic result and the reflection is described like this (Regulations, KHiO, § 11-1)


Artistic practice is at the core of the artistic doctoral result. At the same time, the artistic practice is to be accompanied by an explicit reflection, which, when the project is presented, grants others access into the working methods and insights that emerge from the artistic research. 

 

NMH has a more detailed description of what the reflection must contain (Regulations, NMH, § 11-1):


The artistic reflection shall be documented in the form of submitted material, especially in relation to processes concerning artistic choices and turning points, the use of theory and methodology, dialogue with various networks and professional communities etc.

 

NTNU is the only institution where the candidate must give a trial lecture before the public defense, and the only institution with a regulation that covers both artistic and scientific research.

 

In the institution's PhD regulations, the criteria for awarding the artistic doctorate are described. These regulations will inform the assessment committees work, and it is extremely important that both the fellow and the supervisor(s) are familiar with the home institution´s regulation.

Completed and current PhD projects

A great amount of PhD students/research fellows have already completed the program and presented important contributions to the field of artistic research. And currently a broad array of research projects are in development. All these completed and ungoing research projects undoubtedly forms the largest resource for the program. All completed and ongoing research projects are collected in the Resource Pool of the research school.

PhD student Christian Stene shares his project (Re)phrasing - Shaping Music with Modern Instruments at the ARF 2023, Oslo. 

→ Dive deeper: Reflection - an example

The reflection of Katrine Køster Holst's artistic research project "Mineraler og naturfenomener – kunstneriske uttrykk gjennom regelbasert forskning" is a physical box including several pieces that can be seen/read non-linear. She writes in Norwegian, but the documentation includes images (see "Del 4. Boksen").

Photo: Vegard Kleven 

→ Dive deeperInterdiciplinarity - an example

Gunhild Mathea Husvik-Olausen´s artistic research project "Responsivt rom - en lytting inn i materialitet" includes the work of research fellows from other subject fields. She writes in Norwegian, but the documentation also includes images and videos. 



Photo: Simen Dieserud Thornquist

Organizations and initiatives around the world

In South Africa, the Arts Research Africa (ARA) project at Wits School of Arts, University of Witwatersrand (Johannesburg) has led to several activities designed to create dialogue, stimulate practice, enable research, and inspire collective engagement around the question of artistic research. This is just one of several iniatives around the world that seeks to stimulate and support artistic research and artistic researchers. 

→ Dive deeper: Artistic Research Globally

Last updated 29 January 2025