p r o j e c t   w e e k

Matters of collectivity through embodied practices | 11 to 15 september 2023 | toni areal | zurich

a r t i s t s   i n v o l v e d

Jonas Bernetta | Anna Bila | Annalena Eggenberg |

Karolina Eurich | Marisa Godoy | Lovis Heuss |

Jonathan Lorand | Ula Liagaite | Engy Mohsen |

Delnia Rahimzadegan | Daniel Riniker | Eirini

Sourgiadaki | Tomer Zirkelevech | Tsz Hei Fung |

collective The Field > Mirjam Jamuna Zweifel, Pierre

Piton, Declan Whitaker

Some thoughts
 
Learning while Doing
Doing while learning
Learning without teaching
Teaching through learning
Possibilities of learning
Learning to do something
Doing becomes practice
Practice through collectivity
 
Are students of a programm a collective? 
They might seek for collectivity - but are very different. Connection through differences. How to acknowledge differences. What do I expect? Guidelines?
 
The "student-takeover": Criticising structure and practice. Taking over - what about dynamics? Some get lost. Some talk. The environment for me got less exploring towards more fears and blocades.
 
What do I want to learn? What am I doing? Which structure allows me to do something?
 
I like knowledge. I like to learn. I don't like the exploration of singulars and their feelings. 
 
Nothing happens out of nothing. What do I seek in arts? How can something happen? How can a decision happen, that everything could happen? When is art going broader than the individual interests of its creators? 
 
For me to much centered on processes and emotions. Can "collectivity" be a practice for itself? Don't know. But maybe thats okay. 
 
Thank you very much
I appreciate your kindness and your openess. Your work seems important to me and fruitful for artistic practices, even though it can be quite "anstrengend" - in a good sense: that it made me reflect.
 
 
Kindly
 

f e e d i n g   b a c k

slideshow

p r a c t i c e s   w e   s h a r e d

                                                      >     radical_connector |

                                                                                               

                                                                                                physical interview |

                                                                                                                                     

                                                                                                                                    textual fantasy |

                                                                                                                                                                   

                                                                                                                                                                    gibberish |

                                                                                                                                                                                       

                                                                                                                                                                                        identity score |


                                                                                                                                                                                                                     consent

Physical interview is a practice that Monica Gillette – dancer, choreographer and co-creator of the project 'Brain Dance' – shared with the collective The Field around 2019. On how physical interview came into being, Monica says in a conference presentation (2015):


[…] The third track of the research was physical thinking, so when Mia and I started this project we realized we were doing a lot of talking. We were doing interviews, going to the hospitals, meeting neuroscientists, speaking with people with Parkinson's, talking a lot – a bit like what we're doing here – but we missed our instruments, our bodies. That's how we research, we research through moving, so we decided to commit to a daily process of going into the studio every day and physically questioning what was happening […].


The video of this presentation is available from 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcYXZP4NWfw


Here is my feedback :)

I keep noticing how important I feel it is to also think with the body. During the Physical Interview, I was able to observe – while having my eyes closed – how I feel the tendency to stop something inside me when thinking. Answering a question from spontaneity (I couldn't really locate it maybe its a whole-body-answer) was a wonderful experience. It felt like going with the flow of the question and therefore the answer and then letting it go again because "you move on". Physically and therefore also mentally. I wonder if there are ways to compare the qualities of the answers that emerge from the Physical Interview with the answers from a static posture. Would there be differences or not? Not only from the perception of the interviewee(s), but also the quality of the answers. Do they dare to be more honest? Directness? Do they think less about their answers?

Another question I ask myself relates to collective cooperation. And I wonder how well it really works for me. (Especially when the group is very big) I found it important and good that you and Eirini took the responsibility to moderate, prepare and carry out the project week in a certain way and that there was a lot of room for spontaneity and developing together. At the same time, this searching, this "always trying to coordinate with each other" also had something braking, tiring. I missed the real immersion in worlds of experience and the drive and flow that this creates. 

Looking back, the week leaves me with a vague feeling. Somewhat unclear what was achieved, what was not achieved. If nothing wanted to be achieved, what exactly was the urgency or desire of this way of coming together. 
Perhaps it is also good to move on with these questions. 
In any case, I am grateful for the experience and that this week has always felt like a safe place to try things out.

textual fantasy | proposed by The Field

Textual Fantasy is a communal reading-dancing circle during which partakers read together and experience a movement practice - both led by hosting guest(s). This cosy and informal format is a way to meet different texts, meet each other, and to find ways of physically digesting information.

Sorry for the late response/ feedback, I hope it is still okay to send you now. It was nice having a project week with you and exploring different bodily practices. As I have a background in visual arts, the week was something I was not familiar with. I would like to share my comments and feedback as follows:


Collectivity and embodied practice

We had a dense conversation on the last day when we were chatting and eating, it is still a bit unclear to me the difference between collectivity and collaboration. During the week we spent we worked and practised together, I enjoyed that we were working together sharing the space and trying to develop something together. And that makes me question if that would be already a collective work, or if would it be a collaborative work.

 

For the practice, of Textual Fantasy, I believe it would be more interesting and profound if we had more time to work on it. One thing that struggles me is that it seems from the fantasies we tried and proposed by the groups, the role of the text became the inspiration for the practice, and the rest of the people were just participants of the proposed practice based on the text. I think it would be more interesting to develop a practice with all the people collectively, that we are all familiar with the text and we brainstorm and develop through our body and mind collectively. As for my experience with the textual fantasy we did, I felt like I was just in the position of a participant, I was guided to work and experience my body, but I did not have any input on the fantasy, if that makes sense.

 
With the practice Radical Connector ( hope I remember it correctly) , for example, I would say it helps me to realise the sense of touch in another layer. I appreciated that the sensation started from the physical inner body and progressed into the relationship between self and surroundings. I am also working on my master's project in sensory experience through mixed media, not at all, or at least not focusing on embodied practice. But I realise the very direct communication with my mind and my body through the practices you introduced inspires me.
 
I have to thank you for giving us a space and time to experience our bodies. And the openness you have for all of us is something I didn't think I would need.
 
Best regards,
 

Ula Liagaite's  T e x t u a l   F a n t a s y

Score

Make sure you have a layer of clothing that you would be comfortable taking off. Find a comfortable place, sitting or standing and check in with your body in this given moment. Start by feeling this piece of clothing covering your body, the texture of it (if you can) and the weight of it. Allow your fingers to grab this piece of clothing, in a habitual manner, and start taking it of as slow as you can. As you listen to this text, bring your focus to your breath, to the safety of the dark, warm (negative) space that is being created between you and the clothing, as you submerge into it. Observe what images apear, what became imagined.  Take all the time you need and try to be be as slow as possible.

Silvia Federici, Witch-Hunting, Past and Present, and the Fear of the Power of Women / Hexenjagd, Vergangenheit und Gegenwart und die Angst vor der Macht der Frauen in Hatje Cantz: Ostfildern 2012 (Deutsche Version nur im E-Reader)

Thank you for your letter- I would like to for sure join the self organized movement sessions, or at least be kept in the loop for them. 
 
About last week, I am happy that it took place. It was very interesting to try and fail and try again to put the thoughts on collectivity in practice and in movement, while observing each other.. (I use the word `fail` here as a way to approach learning, not in a negative way) I found the exercise of the `physical interview` especially interesting, although it left me wondering… How do you ask a question? How to `make`the body speak? While observing people engage with the task, I could see the the body aspect of the task (push and resistance) became very blurry and the focus was somehow still on the verbal, the explanation, the information.. I don’t think one needs to be particularly skilled mover to keep up with the task, but what I think is needed is a certain calmness and focus on the neurological level, which is not easy to establish as a ground for this sort of work..  but maybe I am also diving to deep into a very personal need. 
 
When working with ppl who are not engaged with their bodies on a conscious, regular movement or sports practice based way, how does on gather focus? How do do you train? It seems like (and me too) ppl really fall for the sensorial experience of movement, touch, temperature and texture of skin etc, but if feeling is the most unstable, always shifting feature of humans, how to build practice that focuses on more `stable` aspects around movement, being moved, being together in movement..? Just some general wondering here.. :)
 
For me,  this week together generated a space for dialogue, for movement that feels like `constant coming to an understanding`, something that is in constant becoming. I also really thank you for sharing `textual fantasy`. it is a very useful tool to work with text, while questioning the hegemony of understanding..  thinking about the text and information within it and how for it to become knowledge it does not necessarily have to be processed just verbally.. 
 
In touch and thank you!!!
 
Best,
 
 
Dear Marisa, Dear Eirini, dear humans of the field
 
First of all I’d like to thank you, for I could not have hoped for a better start into my studies. Arriving to such an open and curious space with sincere practises, curiosity and a lot of space to investigate was a real privilege. Especially the balance you, Marisa struck between caring for the space and taking responsability while keeping it open to develop in every possible unexpected direction, I appreciated greatly.
 
Some of practises we got introduced to, I will integrate into my own artistic practise, especially the my teaching at the highschool. Since the practises were presented in a very open manner and also discussed, questioned and digested by marisa and the group I feel, that for many of them, there is an easy way to adapt and develop them to many applications. 
 
However the most important questions I take along from this week all concern on the one hand consent and on the other hand the connection between „activity“ and „productivity“. While I feel, that about consent everything I wanted to talk about was already discussed during the week, I think I only now realize, that I don’t know how I feel about the mentioned connection. Whereas I much enjoyed the emptiness, the sincere silence and the breathing-room to process, I also felt that sometimes during the week I would been able to open up and participate more actively, if we hadn’t had given ourselves so much space and time… sometimes. While writing this, I realize that these questions again are closely linked to consent nevertheless…
 
So as you can see, I feel very much in the middle of a thought process that has only just begun last week. In this sense I look forward to the lab very much!
 
Big hug and thanks alot again for this week
 
 
I would also be interested in some open practise (especially also the parcour) and my possible Dates would be tuesday all day, wednesday morning, thursday afternoon. But depending on the week I would also have to balance it with my job and study workload.

video

slideshow

Dear Marisa,
As promised I'll send you my thoughts of last week.
And there they are:

I feel like a sponge filled with content about to burst

I absorbed Ideas, thoughts, feelings and motion patterns

Now I’d like to wring out the spongy pores until I can think again

 

I don't work collectively but in collaboration

I remembered where or how movement is a topic of interest in my practice

 

Emotion is motion with an e

Emotion is motion within the body-interospective

Text/painting can e-move

 

And then again moving is a way to observe, is a way to approach, to get in touch with the other

 

Do I have to ask the wall for consent when I touch it ?

 

Am I the observer or am I being observed ? Obsurface - the surface that observes (us).

(Donna Haraway- Ein Besuch ist ein subjekt- und objektherstellender Tanz und der Choreograph ist ein Trickster.  Unumbitious Stripper - Isabel Lewis - Erotic Love as Sociability - Roslyn W. Bologh)

 

Whats the matter of collectivity ?

 

How does it look ?

How does it taste ?

Whats it’s sent like ?

How does it feels like ?

 

How can embodied practices be a way of researching/reflecting/reshaping/creating relationships between the human and more than human world? 

- Stories of proximity


How would it be translated in, or combined with my visual practice ?

 

Concerning the day to move together I`ll always be here on thursday and friday. My classes will be mostly in the morning so I would have time in the afternoon or at noon.
 
All the best,
 

we also spoke some gibberish | proposed by Eirini Sourgiadaki

One day we borrowed Osho's Gibberish meditation, we changed its duration and we adapted it to a more loose setting. 

We sat down in the room in any place and position comfortable and began with gratitude to the Earth for being here and now. We thought of something that makes our life hard, a feeling or a thought that is really hard to discus with anyone, even with our closest and dearest ones. Then with eyes closed, each one of us started talking about this troublesome feeling or thought, entering a converstation with themselves, all out and loud. We didn't use any familiar language. Everyone made a choice of a language they have no clue of. We went on for almost 15 minutes. Then, we closed with gratutude again, this time either facing up, to the Sky or laying on our stomach, facing the Earth.

Marisa Godoy's  T e x t u a l   F a n t a s y

Score

I proposed that we relate to self, other and the   immediate envrionemnt inspired by Lax's words:

bring things together, many to one, as vertebrae

to the back-bone when things are in line, they

speak to each other when things are in line,

they speak to the whole

Hauff, Sigrid (1999) Eine Linie in Drei Kreisen: Die Innere Biographie des Robert Lax / A Line in Three Circles: The Inner Biography of Robert Lax. München: belleville Verlag

Dear Marisa,
 
Thank you for resending the email. I think the IT at the uni' changed my email address and therefore I didn't get it at first. 
So this is my new email address 🙂
 
First I would like to thank you for the project week, it was inspiring and a great start for my journey at ZHDK and generally in Zurich. 
 
And for the feedback, I separate it into different topics: myself, Marisa, the group, and the practice.
  • I want to mention that I wrote it before our drink outside which light different perspectives regarding the time we spend on talking and about the different interpretations of practice of collectivity. I’m still in a learning process of the ideas that raises during the week and after...:

Me: I learned to take my place and not to shut down even when things aren’t the way I feel, imagine, wish or like them to be. but it’s a hard process of learning and I’m glad I had experience this frustrating emotions before the year actually started and with this environment and safe space of movement that I’m familiar with. I had difficulty with me being block sometimes by things one might have said or done or by too many explanation/ questions/ arguments or ideas that was thrown to the air. I think I still was able to show myself and give honesty, sensitivity and understanding as well as challenging perceptions or triggering, artistically. I was present in any moment even when I was block and I was listening and caring all the time.

 

Marisa- I’m very happy to get to know you, your practice and your collective. I’m grateful for your openness, generous, honesty and friendly way of bringing knowledge, holding the group and yet let everyone be heard. Although it felt to me it was too democratic, I realised that this is new to me and therefore it is so challenging and difficult so I’m taking the frustration as a learning point.

 

The group: I’m grateful to get to know so many different personalities, colours, practices, and souls. They were challenging me to think outside my comfort zone, brought new ideas of conversation, consent, and artistic perception. I understand that some fear of being hurt, or being unheard raises and created for me hesitation about taking risk, step out of the familiar and literally just try, jump into the water and try with our bodies and souls and less with our brains. Those moment for me was difficult to feel part of the group, but I think I overcome it by saying my opinions.

 

Practice: although most of the exercises were familiar to me as my main discipline is dance and I’ve been guided some of these practices but in different names I always find it interesting to go back and try them again, especially with a new group and without having to be the leader. I wish to have more time of practice rather than talking and explaining and less adapting each exercise till it got confused but I understand that that was the need of the group. I enjoy mostly the interviews as I always like to work with movement and text and with personal materials. I feel like it’s the most honest and touching way to get to know each other. I was interested a lot in the textual fantasy, though I feel like it wasn't fully executed. Besides Marisa example which for me was one of the most collective moment of the whole week I felt like the rest wasn’t quite evolved into practice or that maybe I had big expectations to have something more performative and that the practice is at the core of the exercise, I felt it could have gone deeper and I wish to do it again in the days we will meet again. I would love to guide one textual fantasy.

 

Regarding weekly practice, I would be very happy to do it. My options for the weekly meeting would be:


Mon-Wed - I could mostly attend once in every two weeks at any time of the day.


Thursday - I'm free from 13:30-16:30 and every 2 weeks also after 16:30


Friday - free after 17


Sat-Sun- free every 2 weeks.

 

Dear Marisa
 
Here's my feedback to this week: 
 
As you know the first day was not easy for me. I did not feel "good enough" "sportive enough" and "experienced enough". It made me spiral. I am very grateful for how you picked me up in it, and how you started to react from then onwards. 
 
I think the first day is never easy, and with time and getting to know each other there comes confidence as well. Here are some of my thoughts about the first day: 
- The room was very official and "cold", the introcution felt pretty stiff and official (no way to change that I know, but it added to the experience)
- Having several "professional dancers" in the group hightened the pressure for me to "perform" and I felt a thing in the room that people wanted to impress each other. I am very sensitive to that feeling, because of Trauma I think. 
- Not knowing more about the others before moving into what was supposed to be a movement exploration, but also felt like a performance or competition or field of expression felt very vulnerable. 
- Not having movement established as a form of expression (of course we all do, but we first have to tap into it) felt like starting a race at different points. Easy for some, hard for others. 
- By getting to know each other and each others challenges and insecurities as well as strengths, these points of starting move closer together. Also offering different options to woek with different fielda of expertise (video, writing, bringing text and music, possibility to guide classes) breaks the "hierarchy" of how important movement and dance is in the room. It's a real transdiciplinary approach. 
- Simultaneously it offers these "parallel options" in excercises which make everyone feel included. Throughout the week once we knew each other better, they were needed less often but they remained to be an option which gave me at least some security.
 
Then we came to the other difficulties, because we moved away from the preplanned structures and the challenges of collective choices came up. Here are some thoughts about that:
- I always feel like I take a lot of space and influence, and worry that others dont have the same amount of room like I do. This feeling remains as I leave this week. 
- Decisionmaking is a challenging practise as a group and as Engy said, its better to clarify what the practise is. 
- Being part of several really open structures, maybe it would have been an option to hang out a weekly plan and people can write their name and proposal into one slot. 
- I felt there was a mixture between the leaders team holding on to the excercises they established, and the openness to bring in new things. I was always confused as to which degree of opennness exists. If some things were very important to you or fielders or somthing that they remain or are happening a certain way, I would have wished for a bit more clarity on that. (e.g. before we finish the week, I really want to to xyz.) Clarity is also very important in collective work. Then others can also give their comsent to the proposal or not.
 
- I am really glad we didnt do a showing today :)
 
Your pactise is of course a very open and explorative one, and I appreciate and enjoy that a lot. I was glad we were able to give inputs and to be heard. Its smaller things we think about that come as a result of that openness. I would never question this openness as the basis :) More how to deal with certain questions that rise from a week like this. 
 
However, its questions we always face over and over in collective work, and I am interested to see where we end up in this coming semester :)
 
Pleasure to meet you and thank you for this informative and embodied week!
 
Best, 

Identity Score | proposed by Marisa

The Identity Score was shared by Dr Karen Schaffman – performer, educator and somatic researcher – during a workshop she gave at the Theatre Education degree at ZHdK in Spring 2023.

Karen said she received it from Ishmael Houston-Jones, a choreographer, author, performer, teacher, and curator. According to Karen, Ishmael devised the practice with different titles, and also called it ‘Who's in the room’.

links to Karen's and Ishmael's websites | Karen Schaffman | Ishmael Houston-Jones

Matters of collectivity through embodied practices

Feedback / Reflexion

First of all, I would like to say a huge thank you for the past week and the experience you shared and that I was able to live through.

I come from a hip-hop choreography background and this is all really new and exciting for me.

You asked me how this will help me in the future and I want to say that I am already using this experience in practice - in my classes with children and adults and it really helps to build an incredible connection with people on a physical level.

During the week, I received a lot of insights on quite different topics and feelings.

First of all, I'm sure that I will continue to use physical interviewing in my dance practices and textual fantasies when working with audiovisual art. This is what resonates with me the most.

Also, the method of teaching from you as a teacher resonates with me very much. In fact, I always start my classes like this, saying that I am not a teacher and you are not students, we are all learners and I will be happy to learn something from people who have come to me now to get some kind of information or emotions.

I feel that the number of my neural connections over the past week has grown hundreds of times more than over the past few years. This is the most important result of all.

I would personally like to get more names from international practice for the future to build on and find more practices on my own.

And also, I would still like to finish working with the textual fantasy, which we never worked on with the group. Because I am interested in the process of creating a practice collectively.

Thanks you for you

Transcript of audio recording

Hi Marisa, and anyone else who's listening to this I guess I will address it to you Marisa because I view you as the one initiating and response was taken care and was responsible for the module and I'm speaking this message right now on the last day in this time slot that was given for feedback yeah I'm outside and walking around on the ramp and yeah feeling a bit tired and a bit slightly grumpy but not super grumpy but maybe a little disoriented also just to give my state and I didn't really organize my thoughts in advance but I think I like to yeah just follow the movement of my walking and this movement practice thinking and moving together from the feedback around also um here and yeah

 

I think a lot of the things we were working with this week or a lot of the things related to doing this kind of collective processes are quite close to my heart or important to me I think or aspects of them at least and so for me it's nice to give feedback and I also feel a lot of trust towards you as being very experienced, Marisa, being very grounded and very open and not defensive or something very meditative also, and interested and observant and just not judging so quickly or not so reactive in a surface way. I don't know if that's clear but anyway I feel comfortable giving some feedback and the trust that it's welcomed and on listen to in a very open way, which is really great nice feeling.

 

Normally I don't I just give feedback if I don't feel comfortable or, if it's maybe anonymous, maybe it's very frustrating because I like to be engaged and sharing my voice, and saying my opinion that is already a treat so, yeah, anyway blah blah blah blah blah that's a lot already this voice message is going to be long. I hope you have some patience maybe I will have to transcribe this into text, I don't know. So yes, and also I was thinking do I want to name all that some thing's may become as sounding more positive or negative, like things I liked, didn't like blah blah. I don't know if I should try to make it like super balanced or I have a feeling like I have more clarity maybe about the negative things which are some details maybe or larger things and then the positive things are more there are some specific things but also more diffuse.

 

I feel like some processes were happening this week that are not yet clear to me that are yeah that are subconscious or that they're moving on different channels than in my prefrontal cortex and I really feel this is happening but I don't have a grasp of it so that's something I want to acknowledge that I think there was something very rich and nursing and interesting that did happen on a level that's not really accessible right now.

 

I think especially because of working with the body that thinks things are happening yeah through the body doing these exercises being together blah blah blah, yes and then on the more conscious level I think maybe one of the things that stands out most to me is inspiring and interesting for me both, I think in particular just how I am as a human being and everything I do but also in whatever creative endeavors or work I'm doing, but really just as a way of being with people and with myself and in life is something I observe you Marisa like your way of working with us and just like there's something very dancy about it. I guess the word I would say is something that's like grounded, and fluid at the same time, flexible but also intentional, yeah, those are nice active adjectives to describe it, I think.

 

And yeah this is how I want to be in my life, yeah, grounded, fluid, flexible, intentional and I felt like this was really cool to see it in front of me in the way you were interacting with us, and I think it was both like in the individual interactions one-on-one, and then also with yourself and also with the group decision-making, guiding leading space open, but also making decisions yourself and guiding the flow of things sensing also the energy in the room, sensing when it's, you know, people are right for a break, or like that people are not really into this open sharing. Maybe there's different moments where this sensitivity was really, I thought, very fruitful or lovely as a way, as a guiding thing, yes. So that for me was a major, like, inspiration and valuable thing for me in this week, yeah and I think maybe what else could I say as a feedback… Well maybe I go through the… I have a small list of things I would do differently and this is yeah my personal spontaneous momentary feeling about it as suggestions or impressions from my personal point of view. 

 

Let's see, yeah, okay, so one thing I don't know, like, I think one thing is related to this feeling and maybe I could have asked again or clarified I think I still have this feeling of I don't know what we're doing in this week, and I think more clarity around the purpose or for example what we're planning to disband now, like, what is your research question and we are part of your research process actually, and you're talking about consent and research, and I think part of me feels like “Oh, I actually want to know more what it is you're interested in when working with us in this way”. And maybe a clearer sense of how we will be working during the week, like, I guess something about feeling a bit confused of what's happening and then I'm sort of like “Okay I'll wait and see”, but then by the time you wait and see you don't have this moment of being able to relate to it or decide about it because it's already then too late or something.

 

I don't know, there's a conundrum there a little bit, maybe saying it at the beginning doesn't clarify because we don't see it yet so maybe this can run in parallel, but I think I was missing a bit of like OK what are we doing or I think just give the feedback of like collective decision-making process. There could have been a more explicit discussion for example about how we want to decide things together and in the very first day you said something about you don't want to work hierarchically you want to work at eye level and I'm regretting this whole week of not insisting or questioning this beginning moment, like, what does it mean to be at eye level and what kind of decision-making structures do we want to use. And what do we want to wait and what is important to follow and what not, and I think sort of this more explicit talking about how we intend to be together would, for me, have been something that created more trust and more clarity and more sense of engagement.

 

Also because I know what it is I'm relating to and then I feel more like I can decide how I position myself motivationally or consensually or intentionally to it, so maybe it's connected also to this theme of intention, like what are the intentions more explicitly could also be a way to get it. Yeah so I don't… this is maybe having a trouble articulating myself completely clearly, but I think I would have wished for various things including how we make decisions or whose responsibility or what are the different rules to be made more verbally explicit, more specific yes.

 

So that's I think maybe the topic. Then on the first day some concerns were raised about consent and touch. I think I didn't I didn't raise my voice on the first day for whatever reason not wanting to be speaking or things, but I shared the concerns that were raised and the feeling I had also was a bit like, okay, for a group that is heterogeneous and some people might not have experience with touch, some people might have, yeah, various traumas with touch so I felt like the physical interview exercise on the first day without talking about consent, for me that also went just a bit too fast.

 

I think just as a specific detail, yes, and I think in general I also don't know, like, this week is maybe really the focus on movement so then maybe it doesn't make sense to do a lot of things about verbal consented communication or trust. But if it's about collectivity for me I would have appreciated more attention also on, yeah, on these aspects of consent and on the communication maybe on trust, yeah. And then connected to that I was saying today in the physical interview at the end, I felt like not as connected to the group as I would have wished, and I think this has to do with like wanting to hear how people are doing really or authentically and I think there are techniques that can be used to really create actually more trust than we had I think.

 

We had a lot of trust and I felt good in the group but I also didn't feel like really in touch with how people are doing and didn't feel like they were speaking up that much about how they are and what's going on and, for example, having like one-on-one check-ins, like not in just the big group but a smaller one-on-one check in that just stays between those two people or a three-way check in – those kinds of format, in my experience, they create a different kind of space for sharing that creates connection in the group even if it is only exchanged between a couple of people. But if you do those things over and over each day you can have, yeah, this sort of decentralized checking in that creates a web that helps connect the group. So that's one concrete way I could imagine feeling more connected, yeah, and maybe there would be more trust and more authenticity whatever that is, yes.

 

If anything else, I think that's maybe some stuff enough. Oh yeah, maybe the other thing was that like what is this useful for what is the reflection time I think, for my person, I would have wished to talk about, like, what could this be useful for, or why are we doing this, what is the purpose of this because it was framed a bit for me, in my head, it’s like “Okay, these are things that are transferable or helpful for generative processes for collaboration”, but maybe talking about that a bit earlier, for me, would help me, yeah.

 

I think I already said this in the group but connect to what we're doing not just on the last day, but a bit earlier maybe on the third day or the second day, or maybe have that be, like, a little bit on the second day and a little bit on the fourth day or something, yes. Another thing I would wish for while I'm making a wish list, I guess, is dedicated time for personal writing that's longer like 1/2 hour of personal reflection or writing time in the course. I mean, of course I know that I could do it on my own time, but life is also quite dense at times, and consider that as part of the practice, I think, it would be great. I felt, I think I got over saturated or suffocated with always being in interaction, or interactimg a lot so having this sort of alone time with the material, and reflection and writing would have been fruitful for me, yes.

 

And yes, besides that I think I can say it was quite rich. It was connected to various topics that interest me a lot especially like, yeah, movement and thinking and movement and writing different practices. I feel like I got in touch with a lot of ideas of how one can be interacting with these topics. like. the exercises and the variations of them also the different reflections that happened in the group were very fruitful for me, I think, because I heard other people's thoughts, I had new ideas or different feelings or observations were confirmed that I was like having a shared experience.

 

These kinds of things were for me, I felt, sort of, yeah, little seeds that I can nourish if I want to or follow threads that I can follow if I want to, so I felt like there was a lot of a lot of like seeds and threads that started here. What I was bit maybe missing in the experience of it is the feeling of going into a rabbit hole a bit or a depth or going a little bit deeper. It felt kind of, yeah, more horizontal than vertical if that makes sense, but, yeah I don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing. I think for my taste I would like to go more deep into something like, in the future, in the lab for example, yeah, I'm not sure exactly what deep means but I'll leave it just as a word and yes I think I will wrap it up there.

 

Again, a lot of appreciation for the way you did everything, Marisa, and also, like, very impressed with your sensitivity, attentiveness to everyone, yeah, the groundedness, relaxedness – really, really respect for that. Yeah, a lot of care and also that you respected your own individuality and your own desires in the process. I thought that was great, like, you also weren't sacrificing yourself for the group or something. It was… it's you're owning your own thing which I guess makes sense, very much sense to me, or I felt that at least. It's maybe just an interpretation or it's just an interpretation of mine but that makes sense to me when you say this is, yeah, not as you teaching us but an exploration together, yeah, and in general that's what you were jumping in and not being apart, like, away or distant, but you jump in. And putting yourself in, also that created definitely a lot of trust for me and, yeah, respect and interest and yes, okay, I just talked a lot. This is probably very long, apologies if it's too much or too convoluted. I guess this is what I have to say. Bye.

On consent exercises | proposed by Engy and Jonathan

Excerpts from email correspondence

 

[...] As we mentioned earlier, Jonathan and I did a more organic mix between some exercises we came across before, but funnily enough, both were somewhat based on Betty Martin's Wheel of Consent (thanks again Jonathan for sharing!). The ones I referenced were Embodied Encounters by Shahd Omar, which you can find in full in the link.
That's all and stay in touch!
Engy

*********

 [...] regarding the consent exercises that engy and i led, my point of reference was a consent workshop i participated in several years ago at shedhalle in zurich that was led by melanie bonajo and ayo gry. together with pawel dudus, they cofounded skinship in berlin, "a touched base place for kinship centering queer/ trans/ non binary / femme people”. it is a fluid collective of ca. 20 people, and as lovis mentioned, includes deborah macauley who is based in zurich. 
i don’t think engy or i mentioned it, but a well-known and imo useful tool (theory + exercises) is the ‘wheel of consent’, developed by betty martin. i learned about it for the first time from melanie and ayo, and thought to link it here too, as a possible thread to follow for those interested. 
[...]
sunny greetings 
jonathan