Workshop:

- normall about their own topic first

- normally loger

- normally physisally

- normally 1-on1 talks after


Workshop reflection:

- timing?

- phases (1-4)?

- Phase 1 in 4 parts?

- are there things double/too much?

Essaying as collaborative(?) performative practice

 

Introduction 15 min.

- plan 2025

- workshop

 

Start 2025:

3 main topis (https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/1726729/2430432)

- On Pitbulls    RooM Research Mobile (FAA Muzetuin, Tilburg Library)

- On Eniges    SAR SIG Co-Agency (SAR Conference Porto)

- On Sex         Colaboration with Milo van der Maaden

+ On Bruises   Current

Non institutional/public context 

 

Educational/research tool/workshop 

- FAA MA Art Education / Performance in Public Space

- Leiden University PhDArts?

- suggestions?

Institutional context


Contemporary literature

- Artistic Research tools/education/peerfeedback

- Collectivity/collaboration               COST Artistic Intelligences

- Queer literature 

Workshop/tool: Essaying (PHASE 1 + 2) 80 min.


On...

 

Chose a topic/object that is relevant/fascinating/urgent for you at the present moment

This can be a about your research, but also a personal topic or an object that fascinates you.

Note: Montaigne had: on friendschip, on thumbs, on Plato, etc.


Place them together and match (2-3 people

 

We will make a mind map in the Research Catalogue

For supervisors: who is familiar with the RC?


PHASE 1: Creating knowledge fragments

- Different ways of knowing (experiential, sensorial, cognitively)

- Different relationalities (human, non human, nature. materials, phenomena etc.)

- Different media (Objects, pictures, videos, audio, text etc.)

 

PHASE 2: Interrelationality, contextual Mapping - contextualizing - sequensing, placing


PHASE 3: Interaction, interrelationality

No place is fixed, it's a performative colection, a moving archive.


PHASE 4: Dissemination


PHASE 4: Iteration

 

Guidelines:

- Allow fragmentation

- Allow paradoxes and friction

- Allow free association

- Allow both confiming and counter fragments

- Allow the process to lead

 

Not about conclusions

Not about definitions

 

PHASE 5 Sharing 

Sharing pulic

PHASE 2: Clustering (20 min)

 

clustering

 

Perform the knoledge fragments in the mind map;

- How do they relate? 

- What is the proximity to the topic/oject?

- What is the proximity to each other?

- Which ones can be clustered?

- feel free to add new keywords/synonyms in your mind map

 

Interact: how do the knowledge fragments interact? 

- Is there friction?

- Are there paradoxes?

 

- Who can I ask to contribute to this essying topic/object?

 

Take a screenshot or export to PDF

 

 

 

PHAE 1: Experential ways of knowing

(Subjetive, intuitive, emperical, Emotional, spiritual, intangble, primary, lived experience, existential)


1: Personal - experential- way of knowling (15 min.)


  • How did I personally experience (topic/object) in the past?
  • How do I personally experience (topic/object) currently?


text- artistic - free

poetry, diary, song text, play, podcast


work

family

relationships

Hobbies


For instance:

- Anecdotes / situations / experienes

- Songs or books from your past

- emotions / feelings / physical

- context (house, garden, vacation, car,  etc.)

 

Personal positioning: https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/1726729/1774809

 

 

 

PHASE 4: Sampeling

narratief, sequesntie, sequence

 

sampling 

tussenruimtes

interaction

 

Choose a cluster

choose a form

 

 

Collaboration(s):

 

A:

A1Start individually on a topic

A2 Someone adds to your map individually

A3: Discuss together


PHASE 3: Contextual - (Inter)relational  (15 min.)

 

  • Who/what is this (object/topic) in relation to?

 

- who/what is affecteded?

- who/what has influence?

- who/what is included/excluded?

- What ways of knowing and what knowledge fields are there lacking/missing?

 

For instance:

- other people

- non-human animals

- nature

- materials

- technology

 

 

How is relationallitypracticed?

Ethics and relationality - culures of consent / safeguarding

Ethical dimentions

 

2: Sensorial ways of knowing

(artistic, non-verbal, embodied)


  • How does (topic/object) sound? (audio)
  • How does (topic/object) feel? (tactility/material)
  • How does (topic) look? (visual)
  • How does this (topic/object) move? (performative/video)
  • How does it tast/smell?

 

This part is not about discussing the questions, but expressing them in the requested form, start drawing, share sounds,exppress movements, try to work through through these forms

 

Record, video, draw, upload,

 

 

B:

B1: Share topics

B2: Cluster topic in duo's

B3: Essay the topics together

Lecture performance:

On an unmethodologial method

3: Rational ways of knowing

(Objective, Theoretical, discursive, cognitive, reasoning, logic, analytical)

 

  • How does the (topic/object) relate to theoretical sources? 

 

Choose knowledge perspectives:

note: chose at least 2 you unfamiliar with

- historical perspective

- economical perspective

- political perspective

- material research perspective

- Law etc.

 

Per perspective look at different sources:

- news/media articles

- academic papers/books

- dictonary/etymological definitions

 

 

C:

C1: Share topics

C2: choose one topic

C3: All essay the topic together