Improvisation as dynamic, complex system
This project adopts a view of musical improvisation put forth by Marcel Cobussen in his Field of Musical Improvisation (2017), where improvisation is understood as a dynamic and complex system. In this view, the improvisational environment can be understood as an ecosystem in how it is composed of parts that dynamically interact with each other. This includes humans, i.e., the bodies and minds of the performers, as well as the communities they form, e.g., bands, ensembles, or more temporary constellations. But it also involves non-human objects such as instruments, technology – including music notation – and acoustics, things that tangibly affect the musical environment.
Improvising, in fact, may be one of the most complex abilities humans can develop: it requires a tremendous coordination of ears, hands (body), and mind; some learned or instinctive understanding of music (techniques, theory, history, styles, etc.); sufficient motor control, as the improviser needs to be both fast and accurate; and the ability to interact with the environment (fellow musicians, audience, space, acoustics, etc.) while simultaneously playing and reflecting on one’s own playing. (Cobussen, 2017, p. 83)
The field of musical improvisation can be understood as a complex system because of the many ways in which the different elements can interact during improvisation. Adding to the unpredictability of musical outcomes, even small changes in these interactions can lead to significant shifts in the music. Therefore, improvisation becomes a flexible and adaptive process,
, growing through constant adjustments and readjustments by the input from musicians (both learned and spontaneous [re]actions) and the environment (both human and non-human), and resulting in a perpetual negotiating between order and disorder, structure and chaos, free and fixed elements, stability and fluidity, etc. (Cobussen, 2017, p. 84)
A central concept here is the idea of actants, taken from Bruno Latour’s Actor-Network Theory, which are the human and nonhuman components that are a part of the network, actants that are “at work” during the musical process. However, the role of these actants and their connectivity is not given beforehand; it is through interaction with others and contribution to the improvisational environment that the identity as an actant is formed. Thus, an object becomes a musical instrument when it’s played in a musical context, and the performer's identity as an improviser is established through engaging in improvisation. Some of the actants proposed by Cobussen are: the past, the score, technology, the instrument, and the audience.