This accessible page is a derivative of https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/2226731/2226890 which it is meant to support and not replace.

Three maker practices

On this page, each of the three makers briefly introduces their individual practice, in order to situate the development of the projects taken forward during the 3WI project period, as set out in the following accounts of process. 

Marie Hallager Andersen

My background as a contemporary dancer informs my current practice as a freelance performance artist and filmmaker (and facilitator of the Liz Lerman Critical Response Process). The work I (co‑)create—often in interdisciplinary collaborations with academics and other artists — always starts with the body and movement. Sometimes it results in lecture performances or workshops, sometimes in film work. I investigate the body through the technology of filming, with the camera as an extension of my body, and when I perform in direct interaction with video projections or live video editing where images and bodies merge. 

My work often takes its starting point in the life around me. Alan and I have already collaborated in a year-long project based around task setting, ‘Parameters and Practice’, which ended with the birth of our second daughter in 2019, and our family life has always been present in my artistic work. Being pregnant with our first daughter (born 2014) guided the creation of my first film while studying at Trinity Laban Conservatoire (London) on the MA Creative Practice, in which the physical restrictions, tiredness, and feelings of being a pregnant and ‘grotesque’ body were treated as intrinsic constraints that came to determine the structure of the film. (The film, entitled In Becoming, is available here.)

The project I worked on for 3WI grew out of a work-in-progress I presented in 2016 towards the end of my MA for a module entitled ‘The Body As Archive’ (see video clip). It involved a performance in which I stuffed my top with crumpled newspaper, following an encounter with a blue whale skeleton, itself stuffed with newspaper, at the Natural History Museum in London. 

Video description: A video shows a woman dancing in a large studio, with her top stuffed with newspaper. A voice over by Marie describes her encounter with a whale skeleton in the Natural History Museum in London, as well as images from the museum. Click on https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/2226731/2226890#tool-2227957 to watch the video.

The MA work-in-progress became the raw material for the 3WI, developed in two strands. I refer to the strands in 3WI as the ‘Whale Performance’, developed in dialogue with Alan, and the ‘Whale Film’, developed with Martin. The first strand was a direct continuation of the MA performance in which I would stuff my top with newspaper. I was particularly interested in investigating the choreographic aspect of the ‘Whale Performance’ and how I would move as a body stuffed with newspaper. I had already done some initial filming for the second strand in which my two daughters were involved in the act of stuffing. For the ‘Whale Film’, I wanted to focus on the role of sound and so to work on the film’s audio track and soundscape.

Martin Høybye

I have a practice as a recording and performing singer/songwriter, as well as an arts-based research practice in evocative autoethnography and performance. Inspired by evocative autoethnographic writing and performance in which arts-based researchers engage with societal issues through the lens of their own experience (Carless and Douglas 2009; Carless 2017; 2022; Douglas 2019), I explore personal and collaborative songwriting in the context of experiencing environmental impact. 

My personal songwriting practice relates to the field of confessional songwriting, in which songwriters write songs that may involve elements of personal experience as exemplified in the singer-songwriter genre of the 1970s and the works of artists such as Bruce Springsteen or Tracy Chapman. The process of songwriting may also teach the songwriter something about certain issues or experiences that they did not know before they wrote the song, as explained by the singer-songwriter Mary Gauthier (2021). In my practice, I navigate by ‘feeling ways of awareness’ (Blumenfeld-Jones 2016: 322), having to do with how emotional responses to situations create prompts that start the songwriting and create stimuli in the process, while navigating the process from an open, trusting, and sharing phenomenological position through a form of ‘naïve’ emotional honesty.

In my doctoral work, now completed (Høybye 2023), I developed a protocol for co-writing songs with non-songwriters. Many professional songwriters find that conversations that happen in connection with co-writing are often rich in content (Bennett 2013; 2016), and my hypothesis was that this would also be the case if I invited non-songwriters to co-write with me. I engaged in collaborative songwriting sessions to generate songs that responded to the sense of living with anthropogenic environmental impact. Songs were written using words from the jotted notes of our give-and-take-conversations combined with a melody game in which my co-writer would cast dice across the keys of a simple glockenspiel to randomly create stimuli for our melody. After finishing the song, I would revisit the transcript of the conversation and write about the processes of the songwriting encounter using both descriptive prose and evocative autoethnography.

At the time of 3WI project, the empirical part of my doctoral work was done, and thirty-three songs had been written. (Ten of the project songs have since been collected as an album, Songs in the Key of Collaboration, 2024.) I was therefore working through how to engage with the quite substantial amount of documentation produced in the songwriting encounters of my doctoral project. During 3WI, I developed a different song with each of the project partners. With Marie, I worked on a song about the process of songwriting (‘Song To Be Born’). This enabled me to gauge salient qualities of my personal songwriting practice phenomenologically, which was helpful when I came to articulate my approach to personal songwriting in discursive text. With Alan, I worked on a song envisioned as an opener for a live set of co-written songs from my PhD work (‘Song To Open’).

Image description: A CD cover image showing the converging tops of trees seen from directly below, with a simple human figure in white drawn at the centre. The line of the figure becomes the title of the CD, Songs in the Key of Collaboration. Underneath, in the same font is the name of the artist (Martin Høybye). Click on https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/2226731/2226890#tool-3244038 to see the image.

Alan O’Leary

I am an academic filmmaker working particularly in the area of videographic criticism, the audiovisual study of audiovisual and screen media. The videographic critic uses editing software to analyse films, television shows, video games, etc., and typically reports the results in the form of video essays (see the online journal [in]Transition for a range of examples). I am particularly interested in so-called parametric approaches to videographic scholarly analysis, meaning the adoption by the videographic critic of more or less arbitrary self-imposed constraints on the selection of elements from the media object(s) or phenomena studied, and on the formal means by which the analysis is undertaken or presented (O’Leary 2019; 2021). This interest has informed the idea and design of 3WI, which also draws on the experience of working with Marie on ‘Parameters and Practice’, a one-year project in which we set creative tasks for each other on a regular basis.

Parametric approaches are quite widely used in videographic criticism (Keathley and Mittell 2019, Mittell 2019), but video essays tend to be generated using a single set of parameters, or else to use parametric procedures as just one stage of the development of an analysis. In ‘Men Shouting: A History in 7 Episodes’, the project I chose to develop during 3WI, I aspired to perform a more complex deployment of parametric procedure, in which each section or ‘episode’ of the video essay was composed in accordance with a different constraint or set of constraints.

The theme of ‘Men Shouting’ is the way in which cinema typically genders historical agency, and the video essay deals with three films on the 2008 financial crash: The Big Short (dir. by Adam McKay, 2015), Margin Call (dir. by J.C. Chandor, 2011), and Too Big to Fail (dir. by Curtis Hanson, 2011). Each film was allocated a section of the video essay, and then treated in combination with each of the other two films in subsequent sections, as indicated in this diagram of the video essay’s simple permutational structure. My goal was to surface aspects of the texture of the films’ rendition of historical circumstances that might elude more conventional analysis.

Image description: A composite image showing (from left to right) the posters for the films The Big Short, Margin Call, and Too Big To Fail. The first two have pictures of the main actors while the third contains text only.

Table description: A table showing which of the three films The Big Short, Margin Call, and Too Big To Fail are featured in each episode of the video essay ‘Men Shouting’.

Click on https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/2226731/2226890#tool-3244021 to see the images and table.