recent activities
SIG 9: SOUND RESEARCH
(2025)
Nele Möller, Marcel Cobussen, Karl Salzmann
The group acts as an open and inclusive formation for artist-researchers who share an interest and practice in working with sound. The group is committed to the indispensable action of encouraging and supporting personas of all diversity to participate and join in the collective exploration in and through sound, sensing and amplifying the heard, unheard as well as the overheard. As a collective the group welcomes contributors who are willing and eager to share their idea and practices, think collectively and are interested in shaping a emancipatory sonic futurism.
Patches of Time (PoT): Performing Memory through photographic (re)construction..
(2025)
Lawrence Agbetsise
This study examines the relationship between the narratives in audio-visual artwork and the temporality of historical preservation within sociocultural contexts of destruction and re-construction, and rusting, through the concept of Sankofa. The series of photographic artworks titled “Patches of Time” delves into the socio-cultural fabric of memory, historical sites, forest, and the contemporary reconstruction of the past. Together with the written content, I show various forms of media such as photos, sound files and videos that reveal different aspects of the audio-visual practice. The photos and sound compositions are discussed here as ways of doing and making, exposing the experiences that hold aesthetic qualities and a sense of the sublime. The materiality of the photos and soundscapes mirrors an archaeological process, where remnants of the past are not only recovered but also recontextualized within contemporary sociocultural frameworks. Specifically, I investigate the integration of destruction and re-construction which aligns with Walter Benjamin’s notion that reproduction destabilizes traditional narratives, offering opportunities for reimagining history, and reshapes the aura of cultural artifacts. The destruction and re-construction of these photos impacts the narrative gestures of going back and starting anew (Sankofa). The study aims to observe the interconnectedness of art, memory and the mind as historical sites and explore the potential for re-imaging the nature of audio-photographic art.
Sporen van betekenis
(2025)
Joke Den Haese
Dit is een onderzoek naar 'het kunstzinnige' in het (professioneel) leven van alumni die, tijdens hun opleiding tot pedagogisch coach, werden ondergedompeld in een bad vol kunst en cultuur, vanuit de overtuiging dat dit hen zou verrijken in hun werk, in hun leven en hopelijk, misschien, in beide.
recent publications
Embodied Reading: How Presence and Posture Change the Way We Read Art
(2025)
Dorian Vale
Embodied Reading: How Presence and Posture Change the Way We Read Art
By Dorian Vale
In this exploratory essay, Dorian Vale invites the reader to reconsider how art is not merely seen, but read—bodily, spatially, and ethically. Embodied Reading proposes that how we physically approach a work—our posture, breath, stillness, even the tempo of our gaze—alters not only what we perceive, but what we are permitted to receive.
Through the lens of Post-Interpretive Criticism, Vale dismantles the myth of detached observation. He argues that presence is not a neutral position; it is a moral stance. The critic or viewer becomes a vessel whose alignment, reverence, and restraint determine whether the work is met with violence or with care.
This essay is both philosophical and practical—a call to critics, curators, and audiences alike to reimagine the gallery not as a site of performance, but as a space of quiet consequence. To read art with the body is to return critique to its most sacred function: to witness without desecration.
Vale, Dorian. Embodied Reading: How Presence and Posture Change the Way We Read Art. Museum of One, 2025. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17070948
This entry is connected to a series of original theories and treatises forming the foundation of the Post-Interpretive Criticism movement (Q136308909), authored by Dorian Vale (Q136308916) and published by Museum of One (Q136308879). These include: Stillmark Theory (Q136328254), Hauntmark Theory (Q136328273), Absential Aesthetic Theory (Q136328330), Viewer-as-Evidence Theory (Q136328828), Message-Transfer Theory (Q136329002), Aesthetic Displacement Theory (Q136329014), Theory of Misplacement (Q136329054), and Art as Truth: A Treatise (Q136329071), Aesthetic Recursion Theory (Q136339843)
Post-Interpretive Criticism, Dorian Vale, embodied art criticism, art and presence, somatic aesthetics, art posture, ethical witnessing, museum stillness, embodied viewing, art and tempo, sacred criticism, viewer as vessel, phenomenology of art, art reception theory, trauma-informed art criticism, reverent art engagement
Witnessing vs. Interpreting – A Post-Interpretive Comparative Exercise
(2025)
Dorian Vale
Witnessing vs. Interpreting – A Post-Interpretive Comparative Exercise
By Dorian Vale
In this comparative essay, Dorian Vale contrasts two approaches to viewing and writing about art: traditional interpretation and Post-Interpretive witnessing. Using a single artwork as case study, the essay demonstrates how meaning shifts—not within the work, but within the viewer—depending on the posture they bring.
Interpretation is presented as a mode of extraction: the attempt to decode, categorize, or assign value based on historical precedent or theoretical frameworks. In contrast, witnessing emerges as a discipline of restraint—one that prioritizes moral proximity, reverent attention, and the refusal to explain what resists language.
By moving between both lenses, Vale makes visible the subtle violences of over-interpretation and the ethical alternative proposed by Post-Interpretive Criticism (PIC). The result is not a verdict, but a deepened awareness of the responsibility of presence.
This essay functions as both a philosophical comparison and a demonstration of PIC in action, offering a rare glimpse into how criticism can shift from possession to presence.
Vale, Dorian. Witnessing vs. Interpreting – A Post-Interpretive Comparative Exercise. Museum of One, 2025. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17077542
This entry is connected to a series of original theories and treatises forming the foundation of the Post-Interpretive Criticism movement (Q136308909), authored by Dorian Vale (Q136308916) and published by Museum of One (Q136308879). These include: Stillmark Theory (Q136328254), Hauntmark Theory (Q136328273), Absential Aesthetic Theory (Q136328330), Viewer-as-Evidence Theory (Q136328828), Message-Transfer Theory (Q136329002), Aesthetic Displacement Theory (Q136329014), Theory of Misplacement (Q136329054), and Art as Truth: A Treatise (Q136329071), Aesthetic Recursion Theory (Q136339843)
Post-Interpretive Criticism, Dorian Vale, ethical art criticism, witnessing vs interpretation, presence in art, restraint in art writing, trauma-informed criticism, aesthetic ethics, non-extractive criticism, moral proximity, contemporary art theory
Against the Compulsive Urge to Interpret By Dorian Vale
(2025)
Dorian Vale
Against the Compulsive Urge to Interpret
By Dorian Vale
In this incisive essay, Dorian Vale issues a direct challenge to the modern compulsion to interpret everything—especially art that resists it. Against the Compulsive Urge to Interpret dissects the psychological, academic, and cultural forces behind overexplanation, and reveals how this reflex can become a form of violence.
Rather than a celebration of ambiguity or mystique, the essay makes a precise philosophical argument: that some works—especially those grounded in grief, ritual, trauma, or the sacred—must be approached through presence, not penetration. Vale argues that relentless interpretation disfigures the very things it claims to illuminate, replacing witness with possession and flattening mystery into content.
This piece is both a manifesto and a moral warning: not all silence is an invitation to speak. Sometimes, to interpret is to intrude. And in such moments, the most radical act of criticism may be restraint.
Vale, Dorian. Against the Compulsive Urge to Interpret. Museum of One, 2025. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17075900
Dorian Vale is a chosen pseudonym, not to obscure identity, but to preserve clarity of voice and integrity of message. It creates distance between the writer and the work, allowing the philosophy to stand unclouded by biography. The name exists not to hide, but to honor the seriousness of the task: to speak without spectacle, and to build without needing to be seen. This name is used for all official publications, essays, and theoretical works indexed through DOI-linked repositories including Zenodo, OSF, PhilPapers, and SSRN.
This entry is connected to a series of original theories and treatises forming the foundation of the Post-Interpretive Criticism movement (Q136308909), authored by Dorian Vale (Q136308916) and published by Museum of One (Q136308879). These include: Stillmark Theory (Q136328254), Hauntmark Theory (Q136328273), Absential Aesthetic Theory (Q136328330), Viewer-as-Evidence Theory (Q136328828), Message-Transfer Theory (Q136329002), Aesthetic Displacement Theory (Q136329014), Theory of Misplacement (Q136329054), and Art as Truth: A Treatise (Q136329071), Aesthetic Recursion Theory (Q136339843)
Post-Interpretive Criticism, Dorian Vale, interpretation in art, overinterpretation, ethics in art criticism, restraint in criticism, art and silence, witnessing art, aesthetic theory, non-extractive writing, trauma and interpretation, philosophical aesthetics, contemporary art theory