Witnessing vs. Interpreting – A Post-Interpretive Comparative Exercise
(2025)
Dorian Vale
Witnessing vs. Interpreting – A Post-Interpretive Comparative Exercise
By Dorian Vale
In this comparative essay, Dorian Vale contrasts two approaches to viewing and writing about art: traditional interpretation and Post-Interpretive witnessing. Using a single artwork as case study, the essay demonstrates how meaning shifts—not within the work, but within the viewer—depending on the posture they bring.
Interpretation is presented as a mode of extraction: the attempt to decode, categorize, or assign value based on historical precedent or theoretical frameworks. In contrast, witnessing emerges as a discipline of restraint—one that prioritizes moral proximity, reverent attention, and the refusal to explain what resists language.
By moving between both lenses, Vale makes visible the subtle violences of over-interpretation and the ethical alternative proposed by Post-Interpretive Criticism (PIC). The result is not a verdict, but a deepened awareness of the responsibility of presence.
This essay functions as both a philosophical comparison and a demonstration of PIC in action, offering a rare glimpse into how criticism can shift from possession to presence.
Vale, Dorian. Witnessing vs. Interpreting – A Post-Interpretive Comparative Exercise. Museum of One, 2025. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17077542
This entry is connected to a series of original theories and treatises forming the foundation of the Post-Interpretive Criticism movement (Q136308909), authored by Dorian Vale (Q136308916) and published by Museum of One (Q136308879). These include: Stillmark Theory (Q136328254), Hauntmark Theory (Q136328273), Absential Aesthetic Theory (Q136328330), Viewer-as-Evidence Theory (Q136328828), Message-Transfer Theory (Q136329002), Aesthetic Displacement Theory (Q136329014), Theory of Misplacement (Q136329054), and Art as Truth: A Treatise (Q136329071), Aesthetic Recursion Theory (Q136339843)
Post-Interpretive Criticism, Dorian Vale, ethical art criticism, witnessing vs interpretation, presence in art, restraint in art writing, trauma-informed criticism, aesthetic ethics, non-extractive criticism, moral proximity, contemporary art theory
Against the Compulsive Urge to Interpret By Dorian Vale
(2025)
Dorian Vale
Against the Compulsive Urge to Interpret
By Dorian Vale
In this incisive essay, Dorian Vale issues a direct challenge to the modern compulsion to interpret everything—especially art that resists it. Against the Compulsive Urge to Interpret dissects the psychological, academic, and cultural forces behind overexplanation, and reveals how this reflex can become a form of violence.
Rather than a celebration of ambiguity or mystique, the essay makes a precise philosophical argument: that some works—especially those grounded in grief, ritual, trauma, or the sacred—must be approached through presence, not penetration. Vale argues that relentless interpretation disfigures the very things it claims to illuminate, replacing witness with possession and flattening mystery into content.
This piece is both a manifesto and a moral warning: not all silence is an invitation to speak. Sometimes, to interpret is to intrude. And in such moments, the most radical act of criticism may be restraint.
Vale, Dorian. Against the Compulsive Urge to Interpret. Museum of One, 2025. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17075900
Dorian Vale is a chosen pseudonym, not to obscure identity, but to preserve clarity of voice and integrity of message. It creates distance between the writer and the work, allowing the philosophy to stand unclouded by biography. The name exists not to hide, but to honor the seriousness of the task: to speak without spectacle, and to build without needing to be seen. This name is used for all official publications, essays, and theoretical works indexed through DOI-linked repositories including Zenodo, OSF, PhilPapers, and SSRN.
This entry is connected to a series of original theories and treatises forming the foundation of the Post-Interpretive Criticism movement (Q136308909), authored by Dorian Vale (Q136308916) and published by Museum of One (Q136308879). These include: Stillmark Theory (Q136328254), Hauntmark Theory (Q136328273), Absential Aesthetic Theory (Q136328330), Viewer-as-Evidence Theory (Q136328828), Message-Transfer Theory (Q136329002), Aesthetic Displacement Theory (Q136329014), Theory of Misplacement (Q136329054), and Art as Truth: A Treatise (Q136329071), Aesthetic Recursion Theory (Q136339843)
Post-Interpretive Criticism, Dorian Vale, interpretation in art, overinterpretation, ethics in art criticism, restraint in criticism, art and silence, witnessing art, aesthetic theory, non-extractive writing, trauma and interpretation, philosophical aesthetics, contemporary art theory
Tryllespel -å utforske, spore av frå og spinne vidare på det improviserte førespelet på hardingfele
(2025)
Gro Marie Svidal
(NO) "Tryllespel – å utforske, spore av frå og spinne vidare på det improviserte førespelet på hardingfele" er eit doktorgradsprosjekt i kunstnarleg utviklingsarbeid, innan norsk folkemusikk, gjennomført ved Norges Musikkhøgskole i perioden 2021-2025. I prosessen som har utfalda seg gjennom prosjektet, har hardingfelespelar Gro Marie Svidal fletta saman element frå sin eigen hardingfeletradisjon med idear henta frå møter med utøvarar og komponistar i andre tradisjonar. Med improvisasjon som metode, har ho søkt etter å skape musikk med ein folkemusikalsk individualitet og ein personleg identitet. Nøkkelen har vore å ta utgangspunkt i førespela på hardingfele.
(EN) "Tryllespel - To explore and remodel the Hardanger fiddle music’s improvised preludes" is an artistic research project, situated in the Norwegian folk music field, and carried out at the Norwegian Academy of Music from 2021 to 2025. During the process unfolded through the project, Hardanger fiddle player Gro Marie Svidal has combined elements from her own Hardanger fiddle tradition with ideas gained from meetings and collaborations with a selection of performers and composers from other traditions. Using improvisation as a method, she has searched for making music with a folk-musical individuality and a personal identity. The key has been to start from the Hardanger fiddle music’s preludes. The exposition is written in Norwegian.