10
LITERATURE
Assis, P. d. (2018). Logic of Experimentation. Experimental Systems and Artistic Research. Leuven University Press.
Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I., and Bonnefon, J.-F. (2020). Universals and variations in moral decisions made in 42 countries by 70,000 participants. PNAS. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911517117
Breakspear, M. (2017). Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity. Nat Neurosci 20, 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4497
Byung-Keun, K. (2005). Internationalising the Internet. The Co-evolution of Influence and Technology. Edward Elgar.
Busse, R. (2002). Wahrnehmung, indexikalisches Denken und die Möglichkeit einer phänomenologischen Reflexion : Hector-Neri Castañedas Ontologie, Semantik und Wahrnehmungstheorie. (Perception, indexical thinking, and the possibility of a phenomenological reflection : Hector-Neri Castañeda's ontology, semantics and theory of perception). Heidelberger Dokumentenserver. https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00004493
Cicero (2013). Vom Wesen der Götter / De natura deorum. Berlin: De Gruyter (A). https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050061726
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Corning, P., A., (2002), "The Re-Emergence of "Emergence": A Venerable Concept in Search of a Theory", Complexity, 7 (6): 18–30, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cplx.10043
Damasio A. & H. (2006) Minding the Body. Damasio Daedalus, Vol. 135, No. 3, On Body in Mind (Summer, 2006), pp. 15-22
De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2005). What is cognition? A functional- cognitive perspective. In Steven C. Hayes and Stefan G. Hofmann (Eds.), Core Processes of Cognitive Behavioral Therapies. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
Deonna, J.A. (2006). Emotion, Perception and Perspective. Dialectica, Vol. 60, No. 1 (2006), pp. 29-46
Exner, S. (1894). Entwurf zu einer physiologischen Erklärung der psychischen Erscheinungen, Deutike Verlag.
Faraday, M. (1831). On a peculiar Class of Optical Deceptions, The Journal of the Royal Institution of Great Britain.
Fuchs, T. (2018). Die gemeinsame Wahrnehmung der Wirklichkeit. Skizze eines enaktiven Realismus. In Felder, E.
Franko, E. (2009). Yogic Perception, Meditation and Altered States of Consciousness. Austrian Academy of Science Press
Gabora, L. (2016). A possible role for entropy in creative cognition. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Entropy and its Applications, 1–10 November; Sciforum Electronic Conference Series, Vol. 3, E001; doi:10.3390/ecea-3-E001, http://sciforum.net/conference/84/paper/3652
Gardt, A. Wirklichkeit oder Konstruktion? De Gruyter.
Gallager, R.G. (2001). Claude E. Shannon: A Retrospective on His Life, Work, and Impact. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 47, 2681-2695.
Gamez, D. (2018). Human and Machine Consciousness. Information Theories of Consciousness. Open Book Publishers.
Gisin N. et al. (2008). Testing spooky action at a distance. Group of Applied Physics, University of Geneva.
Goldstein, J., (1999). "Emergence as a Construct: History and Issues". Emergence. 1 (1): 49–72. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327000em0101_4
Greve, J., Schnabel, A., (Hg.) (2019). Emergenz. Zur Analyse und Erklärung komplexer Strukturen. Surkamp. 3. Auflage.
Groys, B. (2017). Art, Technology, and Humanism. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/82/127763/art-technology-and-humanism/ Retrieved April 2021
Guohua Shen, Tomoyasu Horikawa, Kei Majima, Yukiyasu Kamitani (2017). Deep image reconstruction from human brain activity. bioRxiv 240317; https://doi.org/10.1101/240317
Hattinger, G. (2006). Über die Sinne. Geschichten aus der Wahrnehmungswelt [eine Ausstellung]. Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseen, Schlossmuseum Linz.
Henry, R. (2005). The mental Universe. Nature 436, 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/436029a
Hilgers, M., Mangez, É., (2015). Bourdieu‘s Theory of Social Fields: Concepts and Applications. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315772493.
Hirsh, J. B., Mar, R. A., & Peterson, J. B. (2012, January 16). Psychological Entropy: A Framework for Understanding Uncertainty-Related Anxiety.
Psychological Review. https://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fa0026767
Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan or The Matter, Forme and Power of a Common Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil, ed. by Ian Shapiro (Yale University Press; 2010).
Huth A. G., Lee T., Nishimoto S., Bilenko N. Y., Vu A. T., Gallant J. L. (2016). Decoding the Semantic Content of Natural Movies from Human Brain Activity. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00081
Huntington, S.P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Simon & Schuster, New York
Hüther G. (2004). Die Macht der Inneren Bilder, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Huxley, A. (1954). The Doors of Perception. Chatto & Windus.
Khalsa, S. et al. (2018): Interoception and Mental Health. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, Vol. 3, Issue 6, p. 501-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.004
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science, New Series, Vol. 185, No. 4157. (Sep. 27, 1974), pp. 1124-1131.
Kobayashi, H. (2010). Self-Awareness and Mental Perception. Journal of Indian Philosophy 38:233-245.
Koch S. (2008). Zur Geschichte der psychologischen Ästhetik. Broschüre zum Forschungsschwerpunkt Psychologische Ästhetik und kognitive Ergonomie des Instituts für Psychologische Grundlagenforschung, Fakultät für Psychologie, Universität Wien, 25-34.
Leder, H. (2013). Next Steps in Neuroaesthetics: Which Processes and Processing Stages to Study? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, American Psychological Association Vol. 7, No. 1, 27–37.
Lefebvre, H. (1992). The Production of Space. Wiley-Blackwell
Lickel, B., D. L Hamilton, G. Wieczorkowska, A. Lewis, S. J Sherman, and A. N Uhles. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78, no. 2: 223–246.
Lyre, H. (2010). Erweiterte Kognition und mentaler Externalismus. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, Bd. 64, H. 2, pp. 190-215. https://web.archive.org/web/20110707004748/https://www.uzh.ch/psychologie/sowi/ssl-dir/ws0607/2150/documents/Text061106_000.PDF
Mantegna, R.N., (2005). Presentation of the English translation of Ettore Majorana’s paper: The value of statistical laws in physics and social sciences. Quantitative Finance, Vol. 5, No. 2, April 2005, 133–140.
Mach, E. (1886). Beträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen, Verlag Gustav Fischer.
McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 159-197.
McCulloch, W. S., Pitts, W. (1943). A Logical Calculus of Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, Vol. 5, pp. 115-133
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw-Hill, New York 1964; critical edition: Gingko Press, Corte Madera 2003
Moors, A. (2007): Can cognitive methods be used to study the unique aspect of emotion: An appraisal theorist's answer. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1238-1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701438061
Müller, K. (2004): Der sechste Sinn. transcript Verlag
Noë, A., O´Regan, J.K. (2001). What It Is like to See: A Sensorimotor Theory of Perceptual Experience. Synthese, Vol. 129, No. 1, Perception, Action and Consciousness, pp. 79-103.
Petzschner F.H, et al. (2017): Computational Psychosomatics and Computational Psychiatry: Toward a Joint Framework for Differential Diagnosis. Biological Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.012
Prakash, R., Prakash, O., Prakash, S., Abhishek, P., & Gandotra, S. (2008): Global workspace model of consciousness and its electromagnetic correlates. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 11(3), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.42933
Quattrocki E., Friston K. (2014): Autism, oxytocin and interoception. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 47 (2014) 410–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.012
Ramachandran, V. S. (1985) The Neurobiology of Perception. Perception (journal), Vol 14, Issue 2, pp. 97 - 103.
Ramesh A., Pavlov M., Goh G., Gray S., Voss C., Radford A., Chen M., Sutskever I. (2021). Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG). https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.12092v2
Ramón y Cajal, S. (1899). Textura del Cisterna Nervioso del Hombre y de los Vertebrados. Moya, Madrid.
Reihlen, M. (2009). Führung in Heterarchien. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254460648_Fuhrung_in_Heterarchien
Rosa, H. (2019). Resonanz. Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Suhrkamp Verlag. 978-3-518-29872-5
Rubik, B., Muehsam, D., Hammerschlag, R., & Jain, S. (2015). Biofield Science and Healing: History, Terminology, and Concepts. Global advances in health and medicine, 4(Suppl), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2015.038.suppl.
Smith, A. M. (2006). Alhacen on the Principles of Reflection: A Critical Edition, with English Translation and commentary, of Books 4 and 5 of Alhacen's "De Aspectibus“. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series, Vol. 96, No. 3
Tononi, G. (2008). Consciousness as Integrated Information: A Provisional Manifesto. Biol. Bull. 215: 216–242.
Tononi, G. (2012). PHI: A Voyage from the Brain to the Soul. Pantheon Books.
Weibel, P. (2000). Wahrnehmung im technologischem Zeitalter. Ostfildern, p.6-23.
Weizsäcker, C. F. v. (1988). Aufbau der Physik. dtv
FIGURES
Fig. 1: Schematic representation of an information flow. Illustration by the author with images from Pixabay/Mohamed Hassan, www.flaticon.com, http://www.freepik.com, https://all-free-download.com/free-vector/download/water-bottle_311922.html,Clem Onojeghuo https://unsplash.com/@clemono?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditCopyText"
Fig. 2: Jambeck et al., (2010). Plastic pollution per person. https://ourworldindata.org
Fig. 3: Guohua Shen, Tomoyasu Horikawa, Kei Majima, and Yukiyasu Kamitani, (2017). Deep image reconstruction from human brain activity. (https://doi.org/10.1101/240317).
Fig. 4: German neurobiologist Gerald Hüther on the power of inner images. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2004, https://www.gerald-huether.de/
Fig. 5: The Kanizsa Triangle, representing an amodal supplement, showing how the brain creates an inner image of a triangle. Gaetano Kanizsa, Max Wertheim, Kurt Levin, Wolfgang Metzger, and many more worked on the concept of Gestalt Theorie since the beginning of the 20th century.
Fig. 6: Sigmund Exner published 1894 a "Draft for a Physiological Explanation of Mental Phenomena". He suggested that internal images must emerge from the activity of neurons.
Fig. 7: Blake Ross on aphantasia https://m.facebook.com/nt/screen/?params=%7B%22note_id%22%3A2862324277332876%7D&path=%2Fnotes%2Fnote%2F&refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&_rdr
Fig. 8: Tseng, J., Poppenk, J. (2020). Brain meta-state transitions demarcate thoughts across task contexts exposing the mental noise of trait neuroticism. Nat Commun 11, 3480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17255-9
Fig. 9: General religious icons. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Religious_syms.svg
Fig. 10: 10th century CE Greek copy of Aristarchus of Samos's 2nd century BCE calculations of the relative sizes of the Sun, Moon and the Earth (Library of Congress Vatican Exhibit,Vat. gr. 204 fol. 116 recto math06 NS.02). https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aristarchus_working.jpg
Fig. 11: 1493 Woodcut from the Nuremberg Chronicle. Also Schedel'schen Weltchronik, Blatt 5 verso
Fig. 12: Photo of the pages 90 and 91 with models of the Ptolemaic system of 1550 SACRO BOSCO "Tractatus de Sphaera" book, from Mario Taddei ancient books collection. Cf.: Geocentric model and De sphaera mundi
Fig. 13: Andreas Cellarius, Heliocentric universe, Harmonia Macrocosmica, 1660
Fig.: 14 The Inglehart–Welzel cultural map of the world (from 2020) is a scatter plot depicting societies on closely linked cultural values, grouped by worldviews, based on the World Values Survey.
Fig. 15: Illustration of a special (individual) field of perceptions. Illustration by the author 2020
Fig. 16: Annette Arlander sensing a special field of perception. Video still, performance, With a Henkel's Yellowwood, 2020. https://www.researchcatalogue.net/profile/show-work?work=815793
Fig. 17: Joseph Kosuth, One and Three Chairs,1965, The Museum of Modern Art, revised 2004, originally published 1999, p. 257, https://www.moma.org/collection/works/81435?artist_id=3228&page=1&sov_referrer=artist
Fig. 18: Boxing a specific field of perception. DV study by the author, 43 sec, 1999
Fig. 19: While a field of all possible perceptions is always outside and determined by the environment, a room of perception is a collective mental construction. "Reisebüro (Travel agency)", installation, and performance of the artist group Bad Beuys, MQ Vienna, 2007
Fig. 20: Illustration of a simple room of perception focussing on one object and creating an ident inner image of a concrete object without contextualization of a Newtonian space. Illustration by the author, 2020
Fig. 21: Iterative room of perception. A study by the author. Ca. 22 x 100 cm, 2018
Fig. 22: Somatic room of perception. The image was taken by the author, 2006
Fig. 23: Virtual room of perception. The screenshot was taken by the author, 2021
Fig. 24: Marc Liberman, Geoffrey Pullum, "balls have zero to me to me to me to me to me to me to me to me to", 2017, https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=33355
Fig. 25: Avocado chair. Computer vision and pattern recognition. AI combined the formal aspect of an avocado with the formal aspect of a chair in different variations. https://openai.com/blog/dall-e/
Fig. 26: Martin Thoma, 10 iterations of applying DeepDream, 2015, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aurelia-aurita-3-0009.jpg
Fig. 27: Reciproc room of perception, Snapshot by the author, 2017
Fig. 28: Schematic illustration of reciprocal rooms of perception. By the author 2020
Fig. 29: Frontispiece of Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan. Or The Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil. Engraved by Abraham Bosse in 1651, modified by the author 2020
Fig. 30: Illustration of three different collective points of view. By the author 2020
Fig. 31: Cod A 172 sup fol 236v, Veneranda Biblioteca Ambrosiana
Fig. 32: Fig. 31 modified by the author
Fig. 33: A multimodal and specific room of perception. Illustration by the author 2021
All links were last accessed in December 2021.