FanFutures

Kate McCallum

"FanFutures" is a project working with artificial (AI) automatic text generation in an exploration of fan fiction and speculation about possible futures. It is a collaboration between an artist, a computer scientist, and a social scientist — and, in an extended sense, also with the fan fiction community and an AI algorithm. Using a data-set of short sci-fi-esque stories written by anonymous members of the fan fiction community, we taught a natural language processing program to produce its own, entirely new short sci-fi-esque stories. The program takes imagined futures written by amateur writers, rather than institutionally-sanctioned voices, and dreams algorithmically through those voices to produce its own re-imaginings of possible futures. We then turned these stories into films, films that depict a computer’s dreams of the future drawn from a mass of unknown voices, using imagery selected by another algorithm. The outputs are feverish and confused, but, as with human dreams, we have embraced their incoherence, and allowed imagery and atmosphere to come to the fore. The project is inspired by our collective interest in understanding how humans make meaning with and through others — and how others make meaning with and through us. In a moment when our rapidly changing world, with its mass communication, new technologies and changing environment, seems almost intractable, we take a creative and playful approach to representing this complex intra-acting assemblage of human and more-than-human elements, and the possibilities in our world through sensory experience.

Bibliography

Alaimo, Stacy, Susan Hekman, and Susan J. Hekman, Material Feminisms (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2008).

Bacon-Smith, Camille, Enterprising Women: Television Fandom and the Creation of Popular Myth (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992).

Barad, Karen, Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books, 2007).

———, ‘Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28 (2003), 801–31 <https://doi.org/10.1086/345321>.

Bonnstetter, Beth E., and Brian L. Ott, ‘(Re) Writing Mary Sue: Écriture Féminine and the Performance of Subjectivity’, Text and Performance Quarterly, 31 (2011), 342–67.

Chander, Anupam, and Madhavi Sunder, ‘Everyone’s a Superhero: A Cultural Theory of “Mary Sue” Fan Fiction as Fair Use’, California Law Review, 2007, 597–626.

Coppa, Francesca, ‘A Brief History of Media Fandom’, Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet: New Essays (Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2006), pp. 41–59.

‘Copyright | Fair Use - YouTube’ <https://www.youtube.com/yt/about/copyright/fair-use/> [accessed 12 October 2018].

Dandrow, Christine, ‘Fandom as a Fortress: The Gendered Safe Spaces of Online Fanfiction Communities’, Media Report to Women, 44 (2016).

Derecho, Abigail, ‘Archontic Literature: A Definition, a History, and Several Theories of Fan Fiction’, Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet (Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2006), pp. 61–78.

Dick, Philip K., Ubik, Reprint edition (Boston, MA: Mariner Books, 2012).

Douglas, J. Yellowlees, The End of Books—or Books Without End?: Reading Interactive Narratives (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000).

Dreyfus, Hubert L., What Computers Can’t Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence, Revised, Subsequent edition (New York: HarperCollins, 1978).

———, What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason, Rev Ed edition (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992).

Ex Machina (Film), dir. by Alex Garland (Film4, 2015).

‘FanFiction’ <https://www.fanfiction.net/> [accessed 30 April 2017].

‘Find Free-to-Use Images - Google Search Help’ <https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/29508?p=ws_images_usagerights&hl=en&visit_id=636749618164267144-1155854306&rd=1> [accessed 12 October 2018].

Fiske, John, Television Culture (London: Methuen, 1987).

Foster, Hal, ‘The Artist as Ethnographer’, The Return of the Real (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996), pp. 302–8.

Foucault, Michel, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977 (New York, NY: Pantheon, 1980).

Foucault, Michel, and Jay Miskowiec, ‘Of Other Spaces’, Diacritics , 16 (1986), 22–27.

Haraway, Donna J., ‘Otherworldly Conversations, Terran Topics, Local Terms’, Material Feminisms, 3 (2008).

Haraway, Donna J., Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene (Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books, 2016).

Haraway, Donna J., ‘A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s’ (Center for Social Research and Education San Francisco, CA, 1985).

Harvey, David, Spaces of Hope (Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Press, 2000).

Hellekson, Karen, and Kristina Busse, Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet: New Essays(Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 2006).

Hetherington, Kevin, Expressions of Identity: Space, Performance, Politics (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1998).

Hird, Myra J., ‘Feminist Engagements with Matter’, Feminist Studies, 35:2 (2009), 329–346.

‘Home | Archive of Our Own’ <https://archiveofourown.org/> [accessed 30 April 2017].

Ingold, Tim, Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description (London: Taylor & Francis, 2011).

Jamison, Anne, Fic: Why Fanfiction Is Taking over the World (Dallas, TX: BenBella Books, 2013).

Jenkins, Henry, Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture (New York, NY: NYU Press, 2006).

———, Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture (London: Routledge, 2012).

Jones, Josh, ‘How to Jumpstart Your Creative Process with William S. Burroughs’ Cut-Up Technique’, Open Culture <http://www.openculture.com/2016/07/how-to-jumpstart-your-creative-process-with-william-s-burroughs-cut-up-technique.html> [accessed 30 April 2017].

Karpovich, A. I., ‘The Audience as Editor: The Role of Beta Readers in Online Fan Fiction Communities’, Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet, ed. by K. Hellekson, K. Busse (Jefferson–London, 2006), pp. 171–188.

Lessig, Lawrence, Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0, 2nd revised ed. (New York, NY: Basic Books, 2006).

Lunenfeld, Peter, ‘Unfinished Business’, The Digital Dialectic: New Essays on New Media (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999), pp. 6–22.

Mackey, Margaret, and Jill Kedersha Mcclay, ‘Pirates and Poachers: Fan Fiction and the Conventions of Reading and Writing’, English in Education, 42 (2008), 131–47.

‘Markov Model’, Wikipedia, 2017 <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Markov_model&oldid=759021734> [accessed 30 April 2017].

Massumi, Brian, Politics of Affect (Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons, 2015).

McCracken, Allison, ‘Fic: Why Fanfiction Is Taking Over the World by Anne Jamison’, Cinema Journal, 54 (2015), 170–75.

Neimanis, Astrida, and Rachel Loewen Walker, ‘Weathering: Climate Change and the “Thick Time” of Transcorporeality’, Hypatia, 29 (2014), 558–75 <https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12064>.

Newitz, Annalee, ‘Movie Written by Algorithm Turns out to Be Hilarious and Intense’, Ars Technica, 2016 <https://arstechnica.com/the-multiverse/2016/06/an-ai-wrote-this-movie-and-its-strangely-moving/> [accessed 30 April 2017].

Pease, Alison, and Simon Colton, ‘On Impact and Evaluation in Computational Creativity: A Discussion of the Turing Test and an Alternative Proposal’, Proceedings of AISB symposium on AI and Philosophy (2011).

Pester, Holly, ‘Archive Fanfiction: Experimental Archive Research Methodologies and Feminist Epistemological Tactics’, Feminist Review, 115 (2017), 114–29.

Reichardt, J., and Institute of Contemporary Arts, Cybernetic Serendipity: The Computer and the Arts [First Published to Coincide with an Exhibition Entitled ‘Cybernetic Serendipity’ held at the Institute of Contemporary Arts, London, August 2–October 20, 1968] (London: Studio International, 1970) <https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=qse5ngEACAAJ>.

Richardson, Laurel, and Elizabeth St Pierre, ‘A Method of Inquiry’, Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, 3 (2008).

Robinson, Edward S., Shift Linguals: Cut-up Narratives from William S. Burroughs to the Present (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2011).

Scholes, R, ‘The Roots of Science Fiction’, Science Fiction: A Collection of Critical Essays (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1976), pp. 46–56.

Searle, John R., ‘Minds, Brains, and Programs’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3 (1980), 417–24.

Sendlor, Charles, ‘Fan Fiction Statistics - FFN Research: Fan Fiction Demographics in 2010: Age, Sex, Country’, Fan Fiction Statistics - FFN Research, 2011 <https://ffnresearch.blogspot.com/2011/03/fan-fiction-demographics-in-2010-age.html> [accessed 24 October 2018].

Springgay, Stephanie, and Sarah E. Truman, ‘On the Need for Methods Beyond Proceduralism: Speculative Middles,(in) Tensions, and Response-Ability in Research’, Qualitative Inquiry, 24 (2018), 203–14.

St. Pierre, Elizabeth A., Alecia Y. Jackson, and Lisa A. Mazzei, ‘New Empiricisms and New Materialisms: Conditions for New Inquiry’, Cultural Studies, Critical Methodologies, 16 (2016), 99–110 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616638694>.

Sullivan, Graeme, Art Practice as Research: Inquiry in the Visual Arts (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2004).

———, ‘Artefacts as Evidence within Changing Contexts’, Working Papers in Art & Design, 2013 <http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/123456789/3005> [accessed 5 September 2017].

Thomas, Bronwen, ‘What Is Fanfiction and Why Are People Saying Such Nice Things about It??’, Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 3 (2011), 1–24.

Townsend, Leanne, and Claire Wallace, ‘Social Media Research Ethics | Dot.Rural’ <http://www.dotrural.ac.uk/social-media-research-ethics/> [accessed 30 April 2017].

Tuana, Nancy, ‘Viscous Porosity: Witnessing Katrina’, Material Feminisms (2008), pp. 188-213.

Wall, Derek, Babylon and Beyond: The Economics of Anti-Capitalist, Anti-Globalist and Radical Green Movements (London: Pluto Press, 2005).

Whatmore, Sarah, ‘Hybrid Geographies: Rethinking the “Human” in Human Geography’, Environment, 2017 <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315256351-18>.

Youyou, Wu, Michal Kosinski, and David Stillwell, ‘Computer-Based Personality Judgments Are More Accurate Than Those Made by Humans’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112 (2015), 1036–40 <https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418680112>.

Tip

Tip