Self-portraiture: on photography’s reflexive surface

Elisavet Kalpaxi

This exposition deals with narcissism, narrativity, self-portraiture, and photography. It illustrates a practice-based research project instigated in 2007 that aims to decode and recover narcissism as a useful sense-making scenario or system. This approach can help make sense of photography and self-portraiture in the present, and can be employed in the development of visual strategies in photographic self-portraiture. Here I present the practical work that was produced and the theory that influenced my practice: namely, the revaluation of the relationship between self-portraiture and narcissism, and ideas from the semiotics of photography and narrative theory. The three main sections of the exposition illustrate the chronological development of my work, and each section is divided into two parts. The first part of each section presents the practical work, whereas the second part illustrates the theoretical aspect of this project, which stems from a wish to reflect on my own art practice and increase my understanding of self-portraiture, while also interrogating narrative codes and devices in photography, such as the double, mise en abyme, and mirroring structures, and their association with narcissism. Drawing on psychoanalytic theory, semiotics, and narratology, I argue that narcissism in self-portraiture can simultaneously represent an imaginary withdrawal of the artist, a structure within the work, and a vehicle for narrativity. By eluding structured language systems, narcissism provides a vocabulary for narrativising procedures, as well as meeting the artist’s/viewer’s modes of engagement. These ideas informed the practical component of the research project and provided the basis for a number of visual strategies employed in the development of the photographic self-portraits that are presented in the second part of each section. In these sections, I also explain the different strategies adopted in producing my images: the role of codes, narrative devices, layering, and reframing for understanding the density of an image and its inherent narcissism. In the process I propose that narcissism should receive a much more central role in the consideration of images and the way they communicate with a contemporary audience.

References

Barthes, Roland. 1977. ‘Rhetoric of the Image’, in Image, Music, Text, ed. and trans. by Stephen Heath (London: Fontana Press), pp. 32–51

———. 1993. Camera Lucida, trans. by Richard Howard (New York: Hill and Wang, 1981; repr. London: Vintage)

Chasseguet-Smirgel, Janine. 1985. Creativity and Perversion (London: Free Association Books)

Dällenbach, Lucien. 1989. The Mirror in the Text, trans. by Jeremy Whiteley with Emma Hughes (Chicago: University Of Chicago Press)

Freud, Sigmund. 2001. ‘On Narcissism: An Introduction’, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIV (1914–1916): On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement, Papers on Metapsychology and Other Works, trans. under the general editorship of James Strachey (London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1957; repr. London: Vintage), pp. 73–102

———. 2003. ‘The Uncanny’, in The Uncanny, trans. by David McLintock (London: Penguin), pp. 121–62

Frizot, Michel. 1998. A New History of Photography (Cologne: Könemann)

Frontisi-Ducroux, Françoise, and Jean-Pierre Vernant. 1997. Dans L'œil du Miroir (Paris: Éditions Odile Jacob)

Gide, André. 1994. ‘The Tractate Narcissus: Theory of the Symbol’, in The Book of Masks: French Symbolist and Decadent Writing of the 1890s, ed. and trans. by Andrew Mangravite, based upon The Book of Masks by Remy de Gourmont (London: Atlas Press), pp. 43–50

Homer. 1997. The Odyssey, trans. by Robert Fagles (London: Penguin)

Hutcheon, Linda. 1980. Narcissistic Narrative: The Metafictional Paradox (London: Routledge)

Jeffrey, Ian. 1981. Photography: A Concise History (London: Thames and Hudson)

Klein, Melanie. 1988. ‘Notes on Some Schizoid Mechanisms’, in Hannah Segal (ed.), Envy and Gratitude and Other Works, 1946–1963 (London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1975; repr. London: Virago), pp. 1–24

Lacan, Jacques. 2002. ‘The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function, as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience’, in Jacques-Alain Miller (ed.), Écrits: A Selection, trans. by Bruce Fink (New York: Norton), pp. 75–81

———. 2004. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis, ed. by Jacques-Alain Miller, trans. by Alan Sheridan (New York: Norton 1978; repr. London: Karnac)

Peirce, Charles, S. 1931–58. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 2, Elements of Logic, ed. by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)

Rejlander, Oscar Gustave. 1988. ‘An Apology for Art-Photography’, in Vicki Goldberg (ed.), Photography in Print: Writings from 1816 to the Present (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1981; repr. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press), pp. 141–47

Sonesson, Göran. 1989. Semiotics of Photography: On Tracing the Index, Report 4 from the Project ‘Pictorial Meanings in the Society of Information’ (Lund: Lund University Press)

Sontag, Susan. 1979. On Photography (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1977; repr. London: Penguin)

Theocritus. 1869. Idylls and Epigrams, ed. by Herbert Snow (Herbert Kynaston) (Oxford: Clarendon Press)

Wolf, Werner. 2005. ‘Pictorial Narrativity’, in David Herman, Manfred Jahn, and Marie-Laure Ryan (eds), Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory (Abingdon, UK: Routledge), pp. 431–35

Acknowledgements

This project was materialised with the valuable help and contribution of Nick de Ville and Ian Jeffrey, whom I would like to thank for their input and support.

Tip

Tip