Conclusion

Go to the next page

Bibliography

Finally, I can conclude the changes in a complex relationship between man-machine interfaces, labor-exploitation-racialization:

First, it is clear that the proposed change in university law is not so far removed from the AI algorithm "work" –  both must work for capital. Future students should work directly for capital, just as the algorithm does.

Second, the amendment to the University Act is a redesign to make productive what is currently presented as "unproductive" reproductive labor for capital: to learn, to think, and to study. Knowledge is to be shortened, made pragmatic, and ultimately directly oriented only and exclusively to the capital-labor market.

Third, trust, care, and knowledge are linked to algorithms and robots. Paradoxically, machine learning still needs to imitate humans in many situations, which is an older (human) model of learning, so that robots and machines can then spread.

Fourth, although ethics and responsibility are directly related to AI, in the Covid 19 pandemic it is suddenly only humans who can prevent the further spread of the pandemic through social distancing and responsible behavior.

Fifth, tomorrow's plural feminists must acknowledge that value is socially constructed through processes of racialization and class dispossession. Citizenship, for those seen as the "other," is prosthetic citizenship, a prop given and taken as a kind of artificial limb, according to the rhythm of neoliberal administration galloping toward increasingly fascist neoliberal democracies.

Sixth, carousel or financialization capitalism, which values only "productive" labor and private property, is based on expropriation, colonialism, and the slave trade, and works hand in hand with procedures for disposing of "unproductive" humanities.