External peripheral sound and noise
I address the heard phenomena of something that can be called as a background noise the external periphery or external peripheral sound. It is something that is basically not part of the seen environment but is affecting it. It is sound source or multiple sound sources that affect your present sound scape from a distance, beyond your visible perception. It differs from other senses in a way that the distance is perceived as a heard phenomenon, not the actual signal of distance between objects (Voegelin 2010, 5) You can't see things that are not visible to you and you can't feel or taste objects you can't touch but you may hear the auditive vibrations sent by them.
As an example in this page I use a sound of a freeway heard from the distance of 1.5km. I find it interesting because basically freeway itself does not transmit any sound, there is no individual source of sound that could be depicted and defined by the sound. It is formed by multiple different sounds coming from multiple different vehicles, ticks from the engine, vrooms from exhausting pipes, suction booms from air purifiers, fooms from the air molecules scraping the surfaces of the vehicle and most of all rubber tires smashing against the tarmac. All these sounds are in constant change caused by the movement of vehicles and alteration of wind. In addition to this there is massive amount of different echoes and reverberations bouncing from surfaces containing numerous amounts of different forms, materials and textures. Plus that many of these reverberating objects are also in constant movement. So you can easily state as a fact that this "sound of a freeway" is no way an individual object. Even though if I talk about the sound of a freeway, almost every even remotely urban person capable of hearing knows what I'm talking about.
This “sound of freeway” is affecting many places outside of its visual sphere of influence. For example it becomes the soundscape for many spaces that would otherwise be nearly quiet, auditively empty. While in the semiotic perspective one can argue that the sound of freeway basically is only signaling the distant presence of moving motorized vehicles, I would like to ask whether this ostensibly heterogeneous mass of vibrations could form some other signals or meanings together with the location it’s affecting. I approach the question from a transcendental point of view, proposing whether the freeway sound and other peripheral background noises could be experienced as temporal signs or something that Eero Tarasti calls as pre-signs “signs in the process of forming and shaping themselves”. (Tarasti 2000, 9) My experiences relate to Tarastis idea (or the way I interpret it) that the experiencing subject is in constant communication with its surroundings and that the subject can form different kind of signs from perceptions and passing moments. Some of these signs do not hold any fixed meanings in them but are more sort of signs that only form their meaning by the subject’s imaginary transcendental act. (Tarasti 2000) By observing the background noise appearing in different locations and spaces from this perspective I try to contemplate my perceptions of for example the sound of freeway as aesthetical sign or “pre-sign” that affect my experience of the place and by which interpreting I form some kind of internal aesthetic meanings.