b-a-d-e.tp.lansner

spikes_noosc_200s_9x3_16.attractor_search: snapshot

correlated activity at this point takes place mostly outside of minicolumns with the same index (almost no gray areas)

cluster of 8 cells out of which a max 2 might be with the same index; cells of between 4 and 8 same index minicolumns are correlated; although fluctuating stronger than the triangle above, this structure has some stability over time

a lot of space between the triangle and the other structures: the rest of the network does not seem on the same page...

small, dark gray triangle = an active attractor

the 2 active attractors are as little correlated as possible (activity vs. non-activity?)

this gray triangle connects 2 line structures without showing its own outline = if it were not for it representing correlatd same-index minicolums, it would not sufficiently form a cluster to become visible; thus, we should not look at this as connector, although it appears as such

weak and limited cross-hypercolumn correlation; not visible before of after; irrelevant?