1. Epistemological aspect of these videos (collection):
- Recording Materials are from 2015 to 2021, which are in different contexts
- Archiving Theme is on the environment in the language sense through the acting, the scenographic, the machine (video and audio recorder equipment), and the relationship to the location (random)

2. Not-knowing (without any guidline of academic knowledge)

Thereby, natural knowledge is in the scope of it, e.g. intuition

3. The issue of Kant's Cartesian notion, we can challenge to solve through the perspective of neuroscience and molecular biology today in the practical exploring. i.e. the subject of tast, such as on ecstasy. Thereby we don't need to have sex or take the drug for awakening, because the terms are in memory, affection, and so on, in the main subject of "consciousness". So that I have explored pain till March 2020, before the corona-pandemic in 2020. -> Wittgenstein (I claim that the academcians as well as art academics in the old generation, they are format, is an old format already.)

Kant's Cartesian notion, is the first format, today's Kant is evoluted. It was the aim of Kant, so his account is an open account. It calls an "openness" academically. Kant's account is Kant's openness towards autonomous potentiality.

*Pneuma:

Pneuma (πνεῦμα) is an ancient Greek word for "breath", and in a religious context for "spirit" or "soul". It has various technical meanings for medical writers and philosophers of classical antiquity, particularly in regard to physiology, and is also used in Greek translations of the Hebrew Bible and in the Greek New Testament.

プネウマ（古代ギリシア語: πνεῦμα, pneuma）とは、気息、風、空気、大いなるものの息、ギリシア哲学では存在の原理[1]、呼吸、生命、命の呼吸、力、エネルギー、聖なる呼吸、聖なる権力、精神、超自然的な存在、善の天使、悪魔、悪霊、聖霊などを意味する[2]。動詞「吹く」（希: πνέω）を語源とする。ラテン語でスピリトゥス、そこから英語でのスピリットとなった。

According to Kant, the judgment of taste is therefore not a judgment of knowledge.
The judgement by Kant is a kind of awareness, but an objective way (outer world).

Minimalism is a subjective way. To know own in the environment is a kind of awareness (inner world). In minimalism, to appreciate the artwork is for brain training (perception and knowledge). So, I don't need to show my intelligence through my artwork, there is no norm of art as an intellectual object, rather the artwork is a reflection of nature (including society).

From the aspect of digital photographic technique:

There are two focuses on this image "Untitled 2020". Most sharpness is on the top of the diamond and reflected the sky through the window (in the original, we can see the reflection of the window.), which is an empty space in this image. I transformed it into another space on a two-dimensional surface. The sharpness of digital photography might be possible to create a dot.

Therefore, I am exploring the attention theory of Wollheim, and the philosophy of digital photography from the aspect of critical theory after Vilém Flusser.

A photographic technology in the process of exposing the film of an analogue photograph to the reflection of light, developing the film, and printing it on photosensitive paper. The technology consisted of the gradation of dark and bright due to the exposure of light.

Reading of the reflection of the light by DSLR (digital single-lens reflex) camera/DSR (Digitale Spiegelreflex) camera.

Speed of light and Einstein's theory of special relativity

These explorations are for the reflection of natural phenomena through the DSLR (digital single-lens reflex) camera, not for attacking people, but rather for awareness of the natural phenomenon philosophically.

Image: Digital Photography "Untitled 2020" by Erika Matsunami, Berlin 2020 (A raw, small resolution of JPEG format, original), without any computer effects.

In the 21st century, what the changing through technology is, our recognition of nature and natural phenomena, which are explored philosophically. -> Rethinking

History of Documentation:

- Dinge und Event werden gravieren (Things and events will be engraved on two-dimensional surface) ->Ontology*

e.g. mural, relief, painting, print media, and so on

- Dinge und Event werden erscheinen (Things and events will appear on two-imensional surface) -> Phenomenology**, Epistemology***/Erkenntnistheorie

e.g. analogue photography, and so on

- Dinge und Event werden lesen und kodieren (Things and Events will read and encoded in or with (?)) ->  (?)

e.g. digital photography, digital sound, and so on.

*the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being.
a set of concepts and categories in a subject area or domain that shows their properties and the relations between them.

**the science of phenomena as distinct from that of the nature of being.

***the theory of knowledge, especially with regard to its methods, validity, and scope.

****the branch of philosophy that deals with the first principles of things, including abstract concepts such as being, knowing, substance, cause, identity, time, and space.

George Kubler and the Biological Metaphor of Art

Bence Nanay

George Kubler was one of the most important art historians of the twentieth century who is especially relevant today mainly for shifting the emphasis from high art to what is now known as ‘visual culture’ and for being the first genuinely global art historian. But what he has been most widely known for is the rejection of the biological metaphor of art—the general idea that artistic styles and movements grow, flower and then wither away. I argue that Kubler did not in fact reject the biological metaphor of art but rather replaced a pre-Darwinian biological metaphor with a  post-Darwinian one which bears remarkable similarities to Ernst Mayr’s concept of population thinking, developed at the same time that Kubler wrote The Shape of Time. Importantly, taking Kubler’s post-Darwinian biological metaphor seriously can help us to understand his distinctive art-historical explanatory scheme.

1. Introduction

George Kubler’s The Shape of Time is considered to be one of the most important books of twentieth-century art history. And not just for historical reasons. Of all the art historians of the twentieth century, the one who is most relevant for the present debates in art history is not Wolfflin or Gombrich or Panofsky—it is Kubler.The reason for this is threefold. First, Kubler was the first art historian who consistently broadened the scope of arthistorical research from objects that are or were at some point considered to be art to a much more universal domain that is known today as ‘visual culture’. The general idea is that when it comes to the study of historical changes in style and visual sensibility, we should not restrict our analysis to paintings exhibited in select art museums but also pay attention to objects that are not quite museum materials, including playing cards, commercial advertising or doodles. Kubler very explicitly down-plays ‘art’ in ‘art history’. Art history for him is the history of man-made objects (some of which some people consider art). And this is exactly the attitude of recent studies of ‘visual culture’.¹

(...)

3. Population ThinkingErnst Mayr was one of the founding fathers of modern evolutionary biology. He is one of the main figures of the so-called ‘Modern Evolutionary Synthesis’, the move of combining Darwin’s theory of natural selection with modern genetics. He is also a very philosophical biologist, who wrote articles and even books that are much closer to philosophy of biology than to biology proper.Like Kubler (see his first argument), Mayr took uniqueness to be a very important as-pect of human life. But he argued that uniqueness is just as important in biology. As he says: ‘The more I study evolution, the more I am impressed by the uniqueness, by the unpredictability, and by the unrepeatability of evolutionary events.’¹⁸

-> What did Einstein say about quantum mechanics?

Albert Einstein famously said that quantum mechanics should allow two objects to affect each other's behaviour instantly across vast distances, something he dubbed “spooky action at a distance”¹. Decades after his death, experiments confirmed this.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00120-6

- Albert Einstein may be most famous for his mass-energy equivalence formula E = mc², but his work also laid down the foundation for modern quantum mechanics.

- Elementary particle

- Quantum mind

"Contradiction" in my research context is the opposite of the notion of Emanuele Severino in his philosophical thought, i.e. on eternity.

Because of my origin, "I was born in Hiroshima in 1963." This means that this city "Hiroshima" in 1945 by the atomic bombing has the negative basis since then by the radioactive. It was the "negative" foundation in the reality, it was the new beginning of this city. Practically, it was effected as the decentralization of urban-planing, communication, as well as the social system, also for our notion of life and death, being of human at the philosophical level.

I call it "dispositive", and practically, I explore it on "dispositive" as x in my artwork. Because we can never know and determine its environmental effect for us. That is eternity, which is not at the humans mental level of "being", and it is our reality and nature.

Severino's essence of Nihilism is rather a kind of optimism in the Western culture towards the reality in nature, even if its origin (cause) was an artificial act by the humans.

Why human would fall into madness? One factor is the environment (milieu). When a person falls into madness, a person cannot recognise since when a person fell madness, that a part of a nature of a person.–towards "Madness" in Sevarion's philosophical thought.

The second factor is Brain disease. Psychology cannot research without your/my body independently, such as the relationship with the neuron system at the molecular biological level.

All humans might possible to fall into "madness" and cannot be discussed at the cultural level only.

As for his "madness", it is rather justification of madness, that was his research aim at the ethical level, how "madness" would be involved in the Western culture philosophically (from 'positive') as a whole of humanity, that means objectivity, was towards the research of the contepmorary law on "being" of human in metaphysics.–Between Tradition and Modernity

My transposition on "nothingness" and "being" of human in Sevarino's thesis, that is human unconscious status, such as in the case of Brain death in the contemporary law.

Sevarino did not work on pluralism. His research position is rather with the distance of Spinoza, as well as Leibniz, and Hegel.

From my research view, Leibniz, as well as Hegel, worked on Idealism, in the case of Leibniz, was his Monadology, however, Leibniz has explored the equation together with Newton. Probably, it is based on Servarion's philosophical thought.

There is no doubt that it (Monadology) was an important foundation of the Western patriarchal system philosophically.

"regenerate" and "generated" mean not repeatedly, I attempted it in this choreography, is an account of minimalism.

"To generate", Generation is the production of an object. Basically, it takes the form of "A produces B" and "A produces B", and the existence of A is indispensable for B to occur.

i.e. The inevitability, my being is the generated DNA of Tazuko (mother) and Masato (father) in time and space (dynamic of emotion). (An independent existence (being) was/is generated.) So, I tell children about the birth, how I learned about the birth from my family, it was today's molecular biology. I don't tell about blood relations, it is not scientific. My family did not tell a "lie" that the stork has brought me. (Issue of Romanticism, people call it fancy or fantasy)

For me, "to generate"  was a wonder and mysterious. The production of a being (life) under the control of the scientist is an arrogant act, not the research. Legal permission is required to produce. Creativity is not the act of producing. Art is for everyone, but it does not mean to allow to imitate for everyone, not due to the copyright, but rather due to the law of the production. For example, if you will produce an artwork similar to my artwork B.O.D.Y. in my context of which refers to "Critique of Pure Reason", it required for 10 years long, but it is not sure, whether you will be allowed.  Photographs, rather than paintings, are about the "transfer" of the object(s), that is (...). That is my passion for photographing more than painting.

In the culture, I think that is in the language.

-> affection, emotion, memory, body, mind,

The issue of epitemology in the digital photography, as well as the digital sound and the digital moving image and digital sound

What is pleasure for us which is an important element x in our life?

Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, ERNST CASSIRER (1923–1929)

ZUR PHÄNOMENOLOGIE DER SPRACHLICHEN FORM

kapitel I. Das Sprachproblem in der Geschichte der Philosophie.

I. Das Sprachproblem in der Geschichte des philosophischen Idealismus (Platon, Descartes, Leibniz).

My great-aunt was a Catholic Christian, her Christian name is Hildegard, and a professor and doctor of natural sciences. Her colleague was Elisabeth Gössmann, who was a professor and doctor of feminist theology in Tokyo and Munich from the aspect of Witch against the Witch trial. My MA thesis is in this context, I have explored together with other students in the practical seminar at UdK Berlin have researched for several years, as well as in the relationship with the Mädichen Haus (the project for the girls against sexual abuse) in Berlin. We have produced the documentary, interviews, posters, post-card, logos, artistic intervention and performances for social advertising.

The mother of my German boyfriend came to the presentation (Rundgang) at UdK Berlin, and she looked at my video clip in the screening with my boyfriend (her son), she was shocked (whether it is an art or not.). But in the context of my family, it was a (high) quality artwork. I have never been criticized like my German boyfriend from my family what I create the artwork as well as for study. My boyfriend told me that his grandmother was a German Nazi. His mother had problems with her mother, and my boyfriend described that his grandmother was racist and strict.

Artistic intervention is for representing the artwork out of the exhibition space or theatre space, its aim is for the cultural evolution. If you play just a piece on the street, it does not mean as an artistic intervention, because of an act through the art. It must be transformed into something "x". I call it "semi-formalism" in the context of art. In postmodernism, it was happened in the context of phenomenology for overcoming the limitation of the metaphysic ontologically. It requires to relate with the new knowledge.

Wörterbuch der Feministischen Theologie: Ca 140 Stichwörter

Everyday Language as Nomenclature in the Tractatus

Subsequently, in the practical exploring model x 1, as well as model x 2  explore also in the art project from 2022 continuously.

In the artistic research, I explore the concept of the art project for the new start from 2022, after the corona pandemic in 2020. And thereby, I explore ethics in and through art theoretically.

My photography is not ontological "peace", but rather "peaceful" phenomenologically and epistemologically. I argue about the limitation of ontological art and its metaphysical expression in aesthetics. I suggest thereby "Semi- formalism", after Nanay's thesis.

This practical exploring Model x is based on Wittgenstein's method, which is his philosophy “Tractatus logico-philosophicus" and also in design, that I mention spatial semiotics and semantics in the environment, which is nonsense, but generally, it would be mentioned as sophisticated. I took the video material from my achievement on the topics of the environment and spatiality between 2015 and 2021. Thereby I don't work on keywords, and also I don't coordinate the video material morphologically.

Which idea of model A, B, C, and also D and E referred to on creativity in communication - intermediation of the language-based Artistic research. Model A is based on a transdisciplinary perspective, and B and C consists of individual semiotics as the multi-modularly semantics. Thereby the conjunction was the leitmotiv in this sentence. A research question was If the art won' be appreciable anymore (without formalism, without frame), how do we relate to the artwork? One is playing, such as cognitive training, as interactive communication, it calls "reading". But as a sense and in a sense, I could not share them, for me, there was nothing something new. Probably for others, to use the words and sentence "fuck you" in the situation, it might be possible to make sense and open the eyes. Thus, I would like to explore the notion of slang and its autonomy, in which terms of empirical aesthetics. I believe that any creations are based on the language sense in mind, as well as through the computer programming language. For example, "Fuck you!" is not slang, but rather attitude through the language. That (Attitude in a visual semantics as an artwork) was called "performative" with Nam June Paik, among many others in the visual arts. In contemporary art, after Nam June Paik, there are Ai Weiwei and Katharina Grosse (Both are contemporary artists and media artists. As if they are represented as Fine artists, that is their attitude and provocation between tradition and modernity.) among many others. – Semiotic in a visual expression, that is as a performative act, it was called a type of artistic intervention, i.e. Joseph Beuys in the 20th century. -> Indroduction "Silence surrounds us, silence around us" - X

Dieses Video ist ein Entwurf und ich habe als neues Konzept an Georg Henrik von Wrights Buch „The Varieties of Good“ gearbeitet.

Ich habe ein paar Sätze aus seinem Buch zitiert und mich mit den Wörtern und deren Bedeutung von Subjektivität und Objektivität im digitalen Zeitalter auseinandergesetzt. Es ist ein Ausgangspunkt der Erforschung für einen Neuanfang meiner künstlerischen Arbeit, die einen Bezug zur zeitgenössischen Ethik hat.

In today's art epistemologically, there is no attitude 'This is ...' that a depiction of an apple was never 'This is an apple', rather rhetorical. Probably, it has never happened an event 'This is....'  in the art.
Since René Magritte's, rhetorical depiction of 'an apple' was changed.

In contemporary art, through the articulation, 'N' is in this image, it is an articulation of subjects in this image.

It can be nature, narration, nativity, negativity, naivety, and more or totally different–N

Photography is my artistic medium, which artistic medium I have self-taught methodologically, since my childhood by my family (engineer, and natural scientists, who were professional educators and scientists at the Japanese national level. One has received the national decoration for her professorship in education (Contribution to scholarship and its education) in the 21st century (after 2000). Maybe, my highest level of education, but in private. Their policy was anti-authority education in post-war.)

Study of form and colour in art by at the individual artistic level, not institutional level.

(I have no my own AI, so I study in this archive, how the AI will use for the art in the archive.)

The institutional level is from the guideline of the government, and the individual level is really artistic individual of the collectivity for a cultural articulation globally.

The problem of automatic correction of an error in digital photography is an imitation of photographic expression of the medium of analogue photography, that people believe as a philosophical expression metaphysically. It made a new symbolism in the culture, which people believe in idealism. The problem is that it establishes idealism, as the metaphor, which can do everyone.

Thereby, I would like to back to the thesis of Cassirer.

This issue applies to the sound composition in sound art/music/audiovisual artwork also.

I teach the arts for everyone, not teaching what is good or bad, but teaching the principles of art with the guidelines of current academic knowledge. (that is my responsibility as an artist always.)

This Photo series is for exploring the issue of symbolism in attention theory which refers to Wohllheim's account.

In this image, "N" what I draw on my hand, is an articulation in the context of semiotics. Articulation itself does not give any meaning to us. If you interpret "N" as Nazi, Nationalism, Nature, Night in this image, that gives no meaning. -> Community

Thereby "symbolism" is a rather brilliant diamond, and why it is?

The design of the brilliant cut diamond is rather a symbolism more than N. And the background of this image is a muster of my bed cover, which I bought in IKEA (my "private sphere", I transformed it into an objective view.).
My question is thereby, towards capitalism between tradition and modernity, changing of value and materiality, culture and capitalism, globality and colonialism, and Western and Non-Western culture. Mostly diamond was used as a material for the technology in modernism, was between symbolism in tradition and technology in modernism, and it is in the context of capitalism. However, in today's technology, we humans reached the imitation of nature. What does mean the material of minerals such as gold, silver, and diamond for us humans in our society in which part of capitalism in the post-material age?
So, this photo series is still ongoing in my artistic research on the issue of symbolism, and it's a good and bad decision through the two-dimensional image. That is the same in the painting, on the two-dimensional image, we cannot judge the material. If you'll sell your ring, that is another question of the materiality of "your object".

That is a philosophical exploration of the social critical theory towards "democratic decision and individual opinion on social media", is it the truth?

– Practical exploring a new economical mode through art from the aspect of critical theory such as queer theory.

I never streamed my artworks of artistic research on social media. I am not a "Selfie", I am a professional artist, and my occupation is an independent artist and artistic researcher. Also, I do not reflect the social and cultural phenomenon. I exlore art and philosophy. I think that the content of my artistic research is at the post-doc level in Fine arts already, because I have been exploring sicne 2000.

I explore "Nonsense art" towards symbolism, is in philosophy that is in terms of “nonexistent object”.

1. The Concept of a Nonexistent Object

The concept of a “nonexistent object” has an air of paradox about it, at least for those philosophers whose thinking is rooted in the Humean tradition. For Hume suggested that to think of an object is always and necessarily to think of an existent object, or to put it differently, that to think of an object and to think of the same object as existing are just one and the same thing. Immanuel Kant took up Hume’s idea and claimed that existence is not a “real predicate”, a claim that is often interpreted as an anticipation of Gottlob Frege’s famous doctrine that existence is not a predicate of individuals. (See Hume 2000, Book 1, Part 2, Sect. 6; Kant 2003, B 627; Frege 1966, pp. 37f.) Kant’s motivation for rejecting the view that existence is a “real predicate” was the so-called “ontological proof” of God’s existence, which says, roughly, that God’s perfection entails God’s existence, since a being that would have all of God’s perfections except existence (i.e., omniscience, omnipotence, benevolence) would be less perfect than a being with the same perfections plus existence. For centuries, philosophers have felt that there is something wrong with this proof, but Kant was the first one who was able to point out a possible error: he argued that the mistake of the “ontological argument” lies in the treatment of existence as a “real predicate”.

Question for the analysis of the digital document by Non-human (AI), e.g. Google lens

 

The gap between human's recognition and non-humans' analysis on the image(s)

繰り返し可能な連続の、それは具体的に何でしょうか？

Damien Hirst's painting technique in his Cherry Blossom:

He squeezes the colour in the same way he squeezes the cream by hand, probably with silicone or latex.
That is his attitude towards tradition ironically. But it is just an idea, as an art, his work is not enough level of representation.

Today's our contemporary society, attitude is individual, we don't have the duty objectively such as good or bad. Damien Hirst can draw with his squeezing the colour by hand, but it is not enough knowledge.
We can read the text with any pose, the attitude of reading is not the subject in the art.

The issue of focusing on "attitude" in the art for the art education through art representation, that the bad attitude as art representation is that it's just the level of judgment and tolerance of being right, not creative.

This is the context of my argumentation "Today art makes a blind spot of the social issue." in capitalism, art as a democratic act.

This issue is the same with the painting “Open Casket” (2016) by Schutz by the Whitney Biennale in 2016 in terms of painting as a democratic attitude. Actually, Schutz did not draw anything on canvas. 

-> In general, confusions arise in using artistic medium when theorists and critics do not treat the concept as a critical one, but instead picture a medium as something that could be identified prior to and independently of any particular artistic uses to which it is put. In Art as Experience (1934), John Dewey attempts to combat this possibility for confusion by distinguishing between an artistic medium and raw material. When we identify some collection of matter prior to and independent of any particular artistic context, then we have identified some raw material, which may, it is true, be put to use for various artistic ends. But we cannot specify what artistic possibilities are available to artists by identifying and analyzing that material. Rather, when a given vehicle is taken up and explored within a particular artistic problematic or tradition, artists discover it as an artistic medium. It is thus through the work of artists that the artistic possibilities of an artistic medium can be discovered, and not by analyzing the material in isolation. In this sense artistic medium essentially is a critical concept. What is possible within a particular medium is discovered by artists as they attempt to explore a particular artistic problematic or inherit a particular artistic tradition. For this reason, what the medium of an art form is, as Theodor Adorno insists in Philosophy of New Music (1948), is a historical question. There is no fixed, ahistorical answer to the question, “What are the material conditions for painting, or music, or any particular art form?” (Artistic medium)

Nam June Paik (his colleagues in FLUXUS, art movement in the post-war) did not work on art in the context of the philosophy of art, but rather he is a pioneer in the media theory in the post-war critically, it means towards commercial media (magazine, etc) and mass media such as TV, as well as film.
Before the media theory in postmodernism was, Benjamin's age was towards radio-broadcasting, as well as film critically. i.e. How it would be use the education. Today, Ramón Reichert's (and his colleagues) research critically. Luciano Floridi's and his colleagues) research is the exploration of ethics (the philosophy of information) from the aspect of technology and innovation critically.

Nam June Paik was originally not from the study of fine arts, he studied at University of Tokyo in Japan. Ai Weiwei and Katharina Grosse are in the context of media art, but without technology. -> Changing of painting and sculpture in the art context in Germany.

Between fine arts tradition (i.e. Munich Secession, Vienna Secession) and modernity in the art academy, in the central Europe.

The painting Cherry Blossom by Damien Hirst is a parody for the spirituality of "nothing" in the philosophical contemplation, such as  Mu/無 in Buddhist culture and nothingness in Christian culture. It is a joke by Damien Hirst, and a current fashion in contemporary art.– not ready-made, but rather "(by) Hand made". I don't think Damien Hirst is a conceptual artist, but rather he is a contemporary art and one of a king of trash art, so he is a famous artist in Germany. I worked never in the context of trash art, I haven't really any ideas about trash art. Joseph Nechvatal as an art critic has been writing often on art in terms of rhetoric in art. Rhetoric is one of the important studies in liberal arts, particularly, which relates to Anglo-American philosophy and Aesthetics. From this aspect, we can see the differences between American art and European art in Avant-Garde in the postwar. I think that without Rhetoric, conceptual art does not work. Maybe trash art wants to hack the 'art', but in which ways?

Intuitional knowledge is based on one's experience through the aim of activity in each environment every day repeatedly is exploring. – An individual specific knowledge.

(I am not Kantian, but if I think in German or English, then based on Kant. All philosophers in Germany, even if Benjamin, he was based on Kant. If one writes a MA thesis, then one is based on Kant in Germany. How to write a thesis, is the guideline of Kant in Germany.)

I am reading a paper by Ernst Cassirer in English, it is so beautiful (logic). How he wrote, I think that he was also like Benjamin, based on Kant.

A double meaning of time, space and body in a sentence -> Japanese Surrealism

In English, it will be expressed within the relationship of sentences before and after this sentence.

Between molecular biological ego in the environment and ego of "I" psychologically in the environment, are in terms of autonomy.

Both are conscious(ness) in neuroscience, so they are the same conscious in human brain actually. That is just the difference in thinking ways through the logic of language. For the arts, it makes the artistic characteristics individually and culturally, something what we are changing in formalism and transforming into another.

From the perspective of the different logics of the different languages

I touched from a depiction (painting) by NF about the background of his crazy yellow and it seems a crazy Wolf towards a review Cherry Blossoms by Joseph Nechvatal, however, what I addressed, is the same context. Although, the depiction in his review has a higher (resolution) level of seeing in current editions and questions for the future art world which refers to the digital age. (Conceptually, it shows modern commercial tricks ironically, but in a conventional way parodically*. Hirst is based on the Western classical sculpture towards the tradition in the contemporary art, which is the foundation of the classical archaeology of study in Abdruck technique. He is against it, but it is only in the context of the specific art world, and it does not refer to the current cultural dynamic. Thereby a question is, whether fashion makes really the wave of "Avant-Garde" in the digital age globally?)

My photography at NF's Atelier-Flat on "crazy yellow and it seems a crazy Wolf" is my contribution. NF's contribution with his depiction is probably we will able to see in the near future, within the future work with his Wife, which refers to the regional life and culture in Germany/Europe before 2020 (till in the 2010s).

Thereby my effort in my contribution was for the gaps between virtual reality and physical and mental reality, as well as the gaps between physical reality and mental reality in and through the arts.

*a. A literary or artistic work that uses imitation, as of the characteristic style of an author or a work, for comic effect or ridicule.

Queer Sites in Global Contexts
Technologies, Spaces, and Otherness, Routledge, 2020

"Queer Sites in Global Contexts showcases a variety of cross-cultural perspectives that foreground the physical and online experiences of LGBTQ+ people living in the Caribbean, South and North America, the Middle East, Europe, and Asia.

The individual chapters—a collection of research-based texts by scholars around the world—provide twelve compelling case studies: queer sites that include buildings, digital networks, natural landscapes, urban spaces, and non-normative bodies. By prioritizing divergent histories and practices of queer life in geographies that are often othered by dominant queer studies in the West—female sex workers, people of color, indigenous populations, Latinx communities, trans identities, migrants—the book constructs thoroughly situated, nuanced discussions on queerness through a variety of research methods.

The book presents tangible examples of empirical research and practice-based work in the fields of queer and gender studies; geography, architectural, and urban theory; and media and digital culture. Responding to the critical absence surrounding experiences of non-White queer folk in Western academia, Queer Sites in Global Contexts acts as a timely resource for scholars, activists, and thinkers interested in queer placemaking practices—both spatial and digital—of diverse cultures."

-> Green x (2022 –)

Practical exploring: Writing and Drawing (2020 –)

-> The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions

Andreas Tsamados · Nikita Aggarwal· Josh Cowls· Jessica Morley· Huw Roberts· Mariarosaria Taddeo · Luciano Floridi

Received: 27 July 2020 / Accepted: 22 January 2021 © The Author(s) 2021

Abstract

Research on the ethics of algorithms has grown substantially over the past decade. Alongside the exponential development and application of machine learning algorithms, new ethical problems and solutions relating to their ubiquitous use in soci-ety have been proposed. This article builds on a review of the ethics of algorithms published in 2016 (Mittelstadt et al. Big Data Soc 3(2), 2016). The goals are to contribute to the debate on the identification and analysis of the ethical implications of algorithms, to provide an updated analysis of epistemic and normative concerns, and to offer actionable guidance for the governance of the design, development and deployment of algorithms.

Keywords

Algorithm · Artificial intelligence · Autonomy · Digital ethics · Explainability · Fairness · Machine learning · Privacy · Responsibility · Transparency · Trust

Psychedelic Cicadas Vol. 2

-> If we live in their environment, like their designed soundscape from the sound recording, our sense will change, but maybe in a profound way. It was the time of Dogen's (道元) and Ryoukan's (良寛) age, what was affected Cage's sense through the literary sense (language sense) in his musical language. In doing so, Cage's sense affected the Brazilian's collective of sound studies. It is very nice, and what Cage wished, it was the "articulation" in the culture.

If I respond to this type of contemporary art with attitude in the context of freedom of expression, it is by the manufacturers (ready-made), and I respond in the art, then through the type of contemporary art by the act. However, that is not important to respond, it makes just us a blind spot on the social issue in capitalism. Duchamp's ready-made itself in the context of today's art does not apply as "x" in terms of the contemporary on "humanity" in humanities and arts. If I will make a ready-made by BIBS Boheme Blossom conceptually, it does not apply as "x" in terms of the contemporary on "humanity" in humanities and arts. For this reason, why "art" is later than actual or out of in contemporary society.

Japanese minimalism and minimalism in English are not the same, because in Japanese there are no articles, as well as masculine, feminine and neutral articles. There is no classification Grammarly, and morphology are also unique. The classification grammar in the modern period (after the Meiji period from 1868) was through the position of "I" and "you", as well as "They" and "We" expressed the social classification. i.e. Honorifics, Humble language in formalism. Minimalism in English is, which was explored in the 1970s, a computer programming oriented new type of grammar in English, such as tree construction of syntax (diagram, Walter Benjamin had an interesting exploration of tree construction and mapping in Berlin which idea was based on stars, not trees. The stars are moveing, and its time, space and body (on randomness in terms of chinese mathematics, but in the European langauge (I had a workshop "The case for Reduction" yesterday)), and particularly for its "relativity".). (For that, minimalism in Japanese helps for the communication without hierarchy friendly, such as in Haiku (that is a letter for the communication). However, it might be similar to minimalism in English, probably it is required to explore grammatical invisible hierarchy, what it means as a language in contemporary society. I attended a workshop on these topics in the philosophy of language yesterday. I start to read papers today.) In Haiku, there is no nominative in its logic, due to the expression of "in-being".
The concept of the upper class and working class (Bourgeois and Proletarier in the context of communism) was defined in modernism that was the social class system in capitalism. Before the modern period, it was a caste system. -> Issue of between tradition and modernity, changing from caste system to national monopoly capitalism, it was all of the western (European, American) countries, as well as in France, after the French revolution. Napoléon Bonaparte (1769 – 1821) was Napoleon I the Emperor of the French from 1804 until 1814 and again in 1815 (democratic, but the national monopoly-military based monarchy, moreover, conquered the Republic of Venice).

Grammatical gender

Gender pronouns

Study in science:

Daring an Invertebrate Perspective on Immunology: Taxonomic Bias, Multiple Realization, and Individuality

Sophie Veigl

Abstract:

In recent years, the philosophy of immunology has become a major area of interest within the philosophy of science. Philosophers of immunology cover a wide range of topics, including cancer biology, individuality, and symbiosis. While the philosophy of immunology aims at providing a philosophy of all immune systems, most, if not all current accounts focus on the particularities of mammalian immune systems. This can partly be explained by the epistemic and material conditions of philosophy of immunology’s target discipline – immunology – which to a large extent also prioritizes mammalian immune systems. The pragmatic reasons for this focus – most immunologists aim at understanding, treating, and curing human diseases – do however not automatically justify its epistemic consequences. In this talk, I will provide an alternative perspective, introducing an invertebrate immune system to challenge some preconceived notions about the immune system. I will question the conceptual distinction between biotic and abiotic triggers in immunology, the notion that only jawed vertebrates display a fully realized adaptive immune system, and the strong dichotomy between physiological and evolutionary individuality. I will conclude by summarizing how an “outsider-organism” perspective can help eliminate epistemic biases in immunology.

The Philosophy Department of the Central European University, the Institute Vienna Circle and the Unit for Applied Philosophy of Science and Epistemology (of the Department of Philosophy of the University of Vienna)

10. November 2021

References

What is simplicity in logical notations? In nineteenth-century logic, the idea of a reduction of logical constants to their smallest possible number was important. Charles S. Peirce discovered around 1880 that all truth-functions of the propositional calculus are expressible by the joint denial operator (Peirce1880a), a discovery often attributed to Henry Sheffer. From the publication of Gott lob Frege’s Begriffsschrift(1879) to Sheffer’s rediscovery the idea of the reduction had stimulated considerable attention among logicians and philosophers.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319405272_Simplex_sigillum_veri_Peano_Frege_and_Peirce_on_the_Primitives_of_Logic

An example of an epistemological response in everyday life:

A woman suffering from irregular menstruation (irregular menstruation is not diagnosed as a disease) is subject to blood tests and other tests for illnesses such as uterine cancer at the doctor's discretion at the hospital. But when it comes to life and the environment, she only knows herself. Measure and fill in body temperature, weight, blood pressure, and pulse at regular times every day. Then, make a note of the daily schedule and keep a diary, etc., and continue for more than half a year. That is epistemological awareness for milieu and own body in everyday life and privacy.

The story consists of the cognition of individuals for their experiences, which is not a collection of individual opinions. My aim is for a soundtrack as a sound composition that is logical and unlogic of time, space and body through the individual cognitions in the languages.


Practical question is, for example, the collection of individual stories in social media, is it evidence of our society or democratic collective opinion? How does AI collect individual information and how does AI recognize morphologically? and how do we recognize and systematize those individual pieces of information?

Between Rhetoric and Nonsense in the arts:

Nonsense literature Alice's Adventures in Wonderland

Nonsense art, hereby I define that an artistic method which is based on the logic of natural facts through epistemological natural-scientific investigations, and which is transformed into literary logic in words. Thereby, the phenomenon that can occur is the gaps between Rhetoric and Nonsense in the arts, such as contradiction, paradox, not only at the logical level, maybe also at the emotional level and so forth. In doing so, at the epistemological level psychologically, one starts to deal with topics and recognise the nature, its dynamics in sense.

I will back to Wittgenstein's and Wilhelm's, I call it here, a transposition from one to another, its procedure and psychological gaps between body and mind. ->Today's Inhabit and Habit in the physical and virtual environment

In practical exploring, I deal with them and embody them in sound composition and notation. -> Architecture

This is still in a drawing from the perspective of "Freedom of Expression" in the media theory towards commercial strategy and the economic war till 2021.

The question is on manipulation always, even if there was in painting since the renaissance.

From point of my research view in artistic research, it is the perspective and intention of the author, representational meaning (including the aim of the representation) between writing and drawing.

-> My suggestion is thereby the virtual space as a third space in-between the private sphere and the public sphere, but it is a new space and time for us. There are in-between filters. It requires many filters between the private sphere and the public sphere for protection – An awareness from the aspect of visual arts.

We need to explore a new awareness of the third space and its time perception. Actually, our range of activities on the database is very wide today.

The main language is English. If one has no business or academic knowledge of English, the work is stressful for her/him. Hence, logic becomes more important and there is a need for simple and friendly communication.

As knowledge (Kenntnis) in the arts, it requires writing the synopsis by the artist (by her/himself), not only designing the art object. For this reason, the synopsis based on an autobiographical perspective, which depends on how the topic is dealt with, is recognized.

In the UK, some researchers mention that artistic interventions or other artistic actions and their responses on social media are today's “avant-garde”. However, my perspective is different from theirs, so I deal with "Avant-garde" philosophically. Avant-garde is not a fashionable mode.
I sense what researchers cannot understand, which is a new fashion wave, they always call "avant-garde". Above all, Social media is the channel, that is today's underground art and culture scene. i.e. today's culture scene, depending on the situation they call it "Avant-garde", but that is "digital underground culture".

Towards "digital underground culture" on social media, in Germany, GEMA supported the establishment of the non-commercial digital platform of music distribution MusicHub for the member of GEMA, after the corona pandemic in 2020. From the test phase of MusicHub in the winter of 2020, I work with them as a member of GEMA but step by step. We must activate and update permanently, which is stressful. For that, for special administration and management, AI works today.

Until now (since 2020), it was legally impossible to control the handling of streamed data, but it is becoming possible. If one copies the protected text and writes it as own, one will find it through AI analysis. Therefore, the argument has to be formalized.

Raimón Richerd mention "cultural techniques of surveillance and transparency" is different from administration and management by AI. AI protects privacy, that is the law, and AI's position is not for the governance or institution and not for the individual person, is neutral on the guideline of the law. But, the authorities, their ideas are for cracking the contemporary law democratically, "The issue is not symbolism objectivity, but rather centralized capitalism and the value of symbolism of good or evil subjectivity. Thereby, symbolism makes a kind of blind spot, in which connection with the art world also exists in part of capitalism economically and globally, therefore, art could form a blind spot whose role is not freedom of expression, but democratically.", that I mention.

-> "The potential for algorithms to improve individual and social welfare comes with significant ethical risks (Floridi and Taddeo 2016). Algorithms are not ethically neutral. Consider, for example, how the outputs of translation and search engine algorithms are largely perceived as objective, yet frequently encode language in gendered ways (Larson 2017; Prates et al. 2019). Bias has also been reported in algorithmic advertisement, with opportunities for higher-paying jobs and jobs within the field of science and technology advertised to men more often than to women (Datta et al. 2015; Lambrecht and Tucker 2019). Likewise, prediction algorithms used to manage the health data of millions of patients in the United States exacerbate existing problems, with white patients given measurably better care than comparably similar, black patients (Obermeyer et al. 2019). While solutions to these issues are being discussed and designed, the number of algorithmic systems exhibiting ethical problems continues to grow.” ("The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions”, Andreas Tsamados; Nikita Aggarwal; Josh Cowls; Jessica Morley; Huw Roberts; Mariarosaria Taddeo; Luciano Floridi, AI & SOCIETY https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01154-8,
Received: 27 July 2020 / Accepted: 22 January 2021 © The Author(s) 2021)

In 2021, what I thought on the topic of 'peace' in the world, and its balance:

"So, American new left knowledge was completely destroyed, which I understood, particularly, I understood through Joan Ruth Bader Ginsburg's. It showed us the right of the American president is absolute and has the decision of nuclear weapons and others in the US internationally. How it is different from the absolute right of North Korea? – That is the "war". From this aspect, the third world war was not a fantasy, was our reality till the end of the 20-years war. Till 2021, NATO and the red cross were on the site, but now, we must think about stopping wars and solving conflicts profoundly.

The problem of internal reform may be that the distortion of capitalism may make the domestic economy monopoly, such as corruption. The distortion of capitalism is the complex subject of time, space and body, and we cannot solve them, like the universe."

 ...

However, after 24th February 2022, the Russian military invasion of Ukraine, we would know about the conspiracy by Russian and communist-socialist countries around the world. "The problem of internal reform may be that the distortion of capitalism may make the domestic economy monopoly, such as corruption. The distortion of capitalism is the complex subject of time, space and body, and we cannot solve them like the universe."
It was by themselves. It showed the state's monopoly policy and undemocratic dictatorship.

"So, American new left knowledge was completely destroyed, which I understood, particularly, I understood through Joan Ruth Bader Ginsburg's case with (towards) the EX-US President D.T." (The questioning of the position and power of the president all over the world which has been selected by people, and its democratic society. What is 'democraty'? and ' freedom of speech? – the changing term 'speech'. That we can see in the conference of the UNO.)　Is it capable of conversing with/by humans?

When humans abandon the ability to have the conversation:

American arrogance, "I have the (fight-) power, I am the politics," has gotten media power, especially with social media. (Establishment of democratic tastes that receive support through the social media), was not only in the USA, was provided all over the world.

For example:

Germany; a G7 member of the Western developed nations, has not changed the German Kanzler/in (Chancellor) for 12 years. That was never happened historically.

It was the American economy and its power, but it also equalized the Russian-led communist bloc through political corruption by politicians. Before and After the corona pandemic, it would be difficult more and more.

Also, if the president of the United States becomes a Republican again, it will be more and more complicated with two extreme poles of nationalism in the world.