In this artistic research, my interest in both artist works is 'attention' in aesthetic value, what it is.
Both artist works are on the way of Post-Feminism in the trans-culture, however in 2014, nobody, even artists didn't understand my idea for this presentation and my understanding about their works. At the presenation, I've sporken from the perspective of trans-culture as well as trans-gender. But, this was my perspective.
Her husband is a turkish migration in Germany and she has children with him. She doesn't understand islamic so well as well as languages. She is atheist, however she tried to understand and to create her project in her concept. I call her this work semiotic personal code. I didn't think her this work as activism, because there was no political aim. Thereby my question was, which kind of attention could given by this semiotic personal code in the intercultural communication, which communication might be creativity? Many people today are atheist, thus it' usual today – a subject of democratic co-existence.
After her generation in art, it has been starting the art from the perspective of the everyday life which art is not in 'metaphysics'. such as art to see into. In this part 3 „semiotics as personal code“, I researched on symbolism and today's art within theories by Cassirer and Goodman philosophically.
The criterion of the art-mediation in this project:
- Do not position Art as an ideal model, but rather to mention Art as "debatte" of.
- To discussed about Art as practical notion and its quality of each art from different perspectives such as gender study and/or culture study, and so on.
Mit der Arbiet von Drapatz wollte ich über Phonograph in Bezug auf die Idee vom Modernismus und Post-Modernisums als Hintergrund von der künstlerischen Idee von Drapatz zum Thema „Ein Ausgangspunkt der Transkulturalität durch den Phonograph“ sprechen.
"Untitled semiotics (Semiotik ohne Title) as personal code" is not about originality, but rather on a procedure of semiotic cross-cultures on the individual level.
Even today in 2020, I like this title "Untitled semiotics as personal code" in this artistic research.
In diesem Teil semiotics as personal code habe ich für das Thema „Die unmittelbare Wahrheit von Raum und Zeit ist ihre unmittelbare Einheit” konzipiert.
Antonyme: Denotation
Warum ist das sachliche und nicht bedeutende Ding oder Akt provokativ insbesondere für den männlichen Autolität?
Research question/Forschungsfrage in der Veranstalltung: Wie schauen wir uns die Kunst an/wie schaue ich mir die Kunst an und was sehen wir durch die Kunst/was sehe ich durch die Kunst?
- Ihr Forschungsthema
- Ihr Forschungsmethod
usw.
Dabei meine Frage ist gleich wie in meiner Kunst-Forschung zum Thema "Subjektivität und Objektivität".
Negetive Seite der Toleranz (philosophische Implikation) und/oder Konsequenz, zum Beispiel, im Konfuzianisums in Zusammenhang mit dem Imperialisums.
In den einigen Kulturen auf der Welt immer noch glauben Menschen die Kaste (Caste), obwohl aus der Forschung und Hinweise in der Molecular Biologie die Kaste (Caste) der Unsinn ist.
Wie man dem toten Hasen die Bilder erklärt, Joseph Beuys, 1965
In meiner Kunst-Forschung wie ich das Thema erforscht habe...